Home security tips for that summer vacation
Coup at the U.N.!
For all you science-geeks and science-geeks-wanna-be's (like me!)
Isn't "skeptical Christian" an oxymoron?
Links to canonical and non-canonical writings of the early Church
Basic answers to basic questions about the Catholic faith
Why do we put-up with Catholic-bashing?
Manly athletes behaving manly (or, "Spirit of Vatican 2 theologians react to papal encyclical")
For when you are too busy for the hot tub
I need a new desk chair!
For the smart-mouths among us (hilarious)
The coming zombie apocalypse: biblical proof!
Red State rebellion based on the 10th Amendment
How Obama got elected: media malpractice
Great media site for commentary on the Obamanation
Motivational poster for philosophers!
30 April 2009
Goofing off...
Toldjah it was a religion. . .His Immenseness Pope Gore I must be so proud.
Why does this sort of thing drive me nuts?
OK. . .my day doesn't seem quite so bad now.
After I get a new laptop, I'm gonna get one of these.
I have enough trouble with the alphabet we use now!
Back to work!
Why does this sort of thing drive me nuts?
OK. . .my day doesn't seem quite so bad now.
After I get a new laptop, I'm gonna get one of these.
I have enough trouble with the alphabet we use now!
Back to work!
29 April 2009
$328,825 for a photo
Drudge is reporting that the Air Force One joyride over Manhattan--the one that Obama knew N.O.T.H.I.N.G. about--costs us $328, 825.
I suppose we should be thankful. The Abortionist-in-Chief could have sent those taxpayer dollars to Mexico and paid for 1,096 abortions (assuming that Moloch charges the going rate in the US south of the border: $300 each).
So, the "publicity stunt" over Lady Liberty quite possibly saved the lives of almost 1,200 kids.
Ah, Hope and Change. . .Change and Hope.
So, the "publicity stunt" over Lady Liberty quite possibly saved the lives of almost 1,200 kids.
Ah, Hope and Change. . .Change and Hope.
28 April 2009
Painting Obama as the crucified Christ not intentional
Update on the painting of the Obamessiah:
from Michael D'Antuono, the painter of the piece:
"The idea of the piece, or the reaction that I'd hoped for, was to highlight our nation's deep partisan divide and how our interpretation of the truth is really prejudiced by our political perspective and I think that to a large degree we are being manipulated by the media. I miss the old day when we just have the facts. Now we have pundits and spin and strategists.
I just thought that through that painting people would see different things. The right and the left would have different interpretations of it based on their political lens. But I have to admit I was very surprised that instead of that I got thousands of email complaining on the religious front. And that was not my intent at all. I wanted to create a dialog politically but not religiously. I didn't mean to make fun of anybody's religion; maybe I did so naively but I didn't mean it that way. In the bible Jesus is The Truth and comparing Obama that way isn't something I meant to do at all.
Apparently, I've upset a lot of people. And I've decided that's not what I wanted to do and I'm not going to display it in the park on Wednesday ... art is meant to be somewhat provocative but the religious element went way farther than I had anticipated."
OK. . .first, I'm very glad that people let this guy know what they thought about his painting. Second, though I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, I find it extraordinarily difficult to believe that he didn't know what he was doing when he chose the crucifixion as his model. Third, I am amazed at his thoughtful response to the public's criticism. Normally, artists long for the sort of public ridicule that this sort of painting receives. Great for publicity. Great for the artist's self-delusion that they are "cutting-edge." Great for raising one's creds in the art world as a self-anointed martyr.
Question: should he have withdrawn the painting from exhibition?
from Michael D'Antuono, the painter of the piece:
"The idea of the piece, or the reaction that I'd hoped for, was to highlight our nation's deep partisan divide and how our interpretation of the truth is really prejudiced by our political perspective and I think that to a large degree we are being manipulated by the media. I miss the old day when we just have the facts. Now we have pundits and spin and strategists.
I just thought that through that painting people would see different things. The right and the left would have different interpretations of it based on their political lens. But I have to admit I was very surprised that instead of that I got thousands of email complaining on the religious front. And that was not my intent at all. I wanted to create a dialog politically but not religiously. I didn't mean to make fun of anybody's religion; maybe I did so naively but I didn't mean it that way. In the bible Jesus is The Truth and comparing Obama that way isn't something I meant to do at all.
Apparently, I've upset a lot of people. And I've decided that's not what I wanted to do and I'm not going to display it in the park on Wednesday ... art is meant to be somewhat provocative but the religious element went way farther than I had anticipated."
OK. . .first, I'm very glad that people let this guy know what they thought about his painting. Second, though I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, I find it extraordinarily difficult to believe that he didn't know what he was doing when he chose the crucifixion as his model. Third, I am amazed at his thoughtful response to the public's criticism. Normally, artists long for the sort of public ridicule that this sort of painting receives. Great for publicity. Great for the artist's self-delusion that they are "cutting-edge." Great for raising one's creds in the art world as a self-anointed martyr.
Question: should he have withdrawn the painting from exhibition?
27 April 2009
I'm not a conspiracy theorist but. . .
Now. . .if I were one of those tinfoil-hat-wearing-New World Order-ruled-by-alien-reptiles conspiracy types, I would be foaming at the mouth right now. . .
Test run for the next 9/11: just making sure!
Scaring up some pretext for martial law?
Run it up the flagpole and see who genuflects. . .or doesn't.
Laying the groundwork for an anti-Church?
The Unblinking Eye watches you watching It
The gospel of Global Peril frightens children, pets, and old ladies
The fastest way to a man's tinfoil hat is through his stomach
Taliban peace-lovers going nuclear?
The battle plan in three parts: American EU, The One's Deception, the Grand Strategy
Christian teaching becoming thought-crimes
No worries! He's coming. . .to take care of us all.
Test run for the next 9/11: just making sure!
Scaring up some pretext for martial law?
Run it up the flagpole and see who genuflects. . .or doesn't.
Laying the groundwork for an anti-Church?
The Unblinking Eye watches you watching It
The gospel of Global Peril frightens children, pets, and old ladies
The fastest way to a man's tinfoil hat is through his stomach
Taliban peace-lovers going nuclear?
The battle plan in three parts: American EU, The One's Deception, the Grand Strategy
Christian teaching becoming thought-crimes
No worries! He's coming. . .to take care of us all.
I'm not a conspiracy theorist. Nor do I believe that This is the End of the World as We Know It. What I do find fascinating is the sharp uptick in stories and commentaries that use apocalyptic language and images to convey basic political disagreements. Both the Left and the Right indulge in this sort of hyperbolic rhetoric. Perhaps this is a remnant of our evangelical Protestant history. Perhaps it just makes good reading on the internet.
Or perhaps I'm an unwilling dupe of our Reptilian Overlords and vehement denial by seemingly rational, well-educated people is all part of the conspiracy!
Back to work. . .
Or perhaps I'm an unwilling dupe of our Reptilian Overlords and vehement denial by seemingly rational, well-educated people is all part of the conspiracy!
Back to work. . .
Glendon declines N.D. award
That bacon you smell frying is Fr. Jenkins of Notre Dame fame. . .
Just announced: Mary Ann Glendon has declined the Laetare Medal awarded to her by the university and has said that she will not attend this year's graduation honoring our Abortionist-in-Chief, the Obamessiah.
The letter is posted at First Things. Demand on the site is causing a slow download, so be patient.
The most telling element of this letter is Prof. Glendon's assertion that she is declining the medal and the invitation b/c Jenkins used her attendance in his "talking points" to cloud the issue of The One's invitation with a thin veneer of "balance." She also spanks him for ignoring the USCCB's guidelines on not inviting and honoring pro-abortion speakers on Catholic campuses.
Good for her!
Just announced: Mary Ann Glendon has declined the Laetare Medal awarded to her by the university and has said that she will not attend this year's graduation honoring our Abortionist-in-Chief, the Obamessiah.
The letter is posted at First Things. Demand on the site is causing a slow download, so be patient.
The most telling element of this letter is Prof. Glendon's assertion that she is declining the medal and the invitation b/c Jenkins used her attendance in his "talking points" to cloud the issue of The One's invitation with a thin veneer of "balance." She also spanks him for ignoring the USCCB's guidelines on not inviting and honoring pro-abortion speakers on Catholic campuses.
Good for her!
26 April 2009
Obama is not the Anti-Christ. . .he's Christ himself
Nah. Not scary at all. Not even a little bit. What's the big deal?
Oh, and here's the Obamessiah's Mary Magdalen
Books I've read about. . .(UPDATE)
As I scurried around my room looking for a prayer book this morning, it occurred to me that I haven't begged for books in a while. . .not very mendicant of me.
So, I got out my "Books I've Read About But Not Yet Read and Need To List" and updated the WISH LIST! I've focused on books that will I will use when I start teaching here in the fall (God willing. . .).
(UPDATE: Wow! Thanks for the quick response to my begging. . .I guess it doesn't hurt to ask, uh?)
I recently rec'd two books (authors Pannenberg & Staniloae) that will be acknowledged with a Thank You card tomorrow morning.
Please keep up the prayers as I finish the manuscript for my own prayer book (linked to the right). So far, everything is right on schedule.
As alway, mille grazie. . .grazie mille!
P.S. And yes, I will be getting back to weekly homilies once the manuscript is done.
So, I got out my "Books I've Read About But Not Yet Read and Need To List" and updated the WISH LIST! I've focused on books that will I will use when I start teaching here in the fall (God willing. . .).
(UPDATE: Wow! Thanks for the quick response to my begging. . .I guess it doesn't hurt to ask, uh?)
I recently rec'd two books (authors Pannenberg & Staniloae) that will be acknowledged with a Thank You card tomorrow morning.
Please keep up the prayers as I finish the manuscript for my own prayer book (linked to the right). So far, everything is right on schedule.
As alway, mille grazie. . .grazie mille!
P.S. And yes, I will be getting back to weekly homilies once the manuscript is done.
A Dominican bear in Rome!
This will be me if I don't cut my hair and trim my beard very, very soon!H/T: The American Papist
24 April 2009
Coffee Bowl Browsing
Yet another reason to think that Super Nanny States are a bad idea
Protestant sect lays illegit claim to apostolic succession (Ugly Vestment Alert!)
Bishop D'Arcy spanks Fr. Jenkins for consulting with everyone but his own bishop
Faith on the Edge: GodSpy
The Civic Vices
My latest addiction
Book reviews, book reviews, book reviews
And even more book reviews
A George Weigel on-line archive
26 philosophical lectures on life, death, the soul, immortality
Eccentric words of wisdom
Funny philosophical one-liners (prepare to groan)
Jane Austen zombified
Protestant sect lays illegit claim to apostolic succession (Ugly Vestment Alert!)
Bishop D'Arcy spanks Fr. Jenkins for consulting with everyone but his own bishop
Faith on the Edge: GodSpy
The Civic Vices
My latest addiction
Book reviews, book reviews, book reviews
And even more book reviews
A George Weigel on-line archive
26 philosophical lectures on life, death, the soul, immortality
Eccentric words of wisdom
Funny philosophical one-liners (prepare to groan)
Jane Austen zombified
23 April 2009
The Crescat: Cannonball Blog Awards 2009
Truly, I am honored!
HancAquam has been nominated for recognition by the 2009 Cannonball Blog Awards, "a blog award not dominated by the usual suspects," in the category: "Best Blog by a Religious Who's Not Fr. Z."
I'll keep you posted when voting starts. . .
HancAquam has been nominated for recognition by the 2009 Cannonball Blog Awards, "a blog award not dominated by the usual suspects," in the category: "Best Blog by a Religious Who's Not Fr. Z."
These awards are meant to recognize "minor bloggers," those of us who don't get Mark Shea's and Fr. Z.'s level of traffic (e.g., HancAquam is averaging about 360 hits daily).
Head over and suggest a couple of more categories. . .my fav so far: "Best Bat Sh*t Crazy Blog"!
I'll keep you posted when voting starts. . .
22 April 2009
Laptop of my future?
If and when (God forbid!) I need to get a new laptop, I've decided that it will be this one:
Toshiba Satellite P305-S8904 (link)
I've configured it for the max bang for my mini bucks. . .this configuration is $870.00:
Since most of this is complete gibberish to me, I would appreciate comments!
By comparison, what do we think of this one? (Satellite L355)
Toshiba Satellite P305-S8904 (link)
I've configured it for the max bang for my mini bucks. . .this configuration is $870.00:
|
By comparison, what do we think of this one? (Satellite L355)
21 April 2009
more Coffee Bowl Browsing. . .
Planned Parenthood: killing babies and abetting child rape since 1921 (video embedded)
Church of Global Warming extremists scaring kids into obedience
This would never happen to me. . .I barely fit in the in-flight outhouse
It worked! Doesn't matter. . .it's still wrong
Left-lib journalist calls The One's stand against charter schools a sin
A lesson in republican (not GOP) values
The (very) positive side of the long-awaited "biological solution"
Martyred on the gallows of Tolerant Leftist Harpies
Pultizer Prizes announced! One of my fav poets won: W.S. Merwin
The Myth/Reality of "green jobs". . .hint: H.U.G.E. failure in Spain
The nation's most liberal court upholds the Second Amendment
Church of Global Warming extremists scaring kids into obedience
This would never happen to me. . .I barely fit in the in-flight outhouse
It worked! Doesn't matter. . .it's still wrong
Left-lib journalist calls The One's stand against charter schools a sin
A lesson in republican (not GOP) values
The (very) positive side of the long-awaited "biological solution"
Martyred on the gallows of Tolerant Leftist Harpies
Pultizer Prizes announced! One of my fav poets won: W.S. Merwin
The Myth/Reality of "green jobs". . .hint: H.U.G.E. failure in Spain
The nation's most liberal court upholds the Second Amendment
Chunky Monkeys Skunking Climate, or Al Gore Wants You on a Diet!
OK. . .the Church of Global Warming is getting even more hysterical since recent polls show that their alarmist propaganda isn't working on the American public.
Case in point: Fatties are causing global warming. Apparently, idiocy in the service of ideology has no shame.
H/T: Drudge
H/T: Drudge
20 April 2009
The weight of convincing truth
Look! A homily! Remember those. . .?
2nd Week of Easter (T): Acts 4.32-37; John 3.7-15
Fr. Philip N. Powell, OP
Convento SS. Domenico e Sisto, Roma
If I were to tell you that I witnessed the student protests in Tiananmen Square in 1989, while teaching English in China, you might want to know how I felt and what I was thinking. If I were to tell you that I witnessed the end of WWII, the surrender of the Axis Powers to the Allies in 1945, you might begin to wonder a bit about my age. If I were to tell you that I witnessed Pontus Pilate abandon Christ to the brutal mercies of the crowd in first-century Jerusalem, you would smile sympathetically, pat me on the shoulder, and then tell your friends, “That Fr. Philip is a really nice guy, but sometimes he lies.” If then, I were to bear witness to Jesus’ death, burial, and resurrection from the dead, would you believe me? What is it that gives our witness the convincing weight of truth?
Nicodemus, Jewish political and religious leader, wealthy, upright citizen, approaches Jesus at night and poses several questions about the nature and necessity of being “born again.” In the dark of his night, Nicodemus seeks Christ’s light. Unfortunately, Jesus’ answers lead to more questions. Eventually, Jesus chastises Nicodemus, saying, “[…] we speak of what we know and we testify to what we have seen, but you people do not accept our testimony. If I tell you about earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you about heavenly things?” Jesus is putting the burden of belief on Nicodemus, chastising him for not accepting his witness to the truth of earthly things. But let’s look at it from Nicodemus’ view. What reason has Jesus given him to believe his testimony? What gives Jesus’ witness the convincing weight of truth?
Let’s bring this question home: why should anyone who does not believe the Church’s witness to Christ take our testimony about Christ as evidence for the truth of the gospel? Why should the non-believer believe you when you say, “Alleluia! Christ is risen!”? We have a hint in Acts: “The community of believers was of one heart and mind […] With great power the Apostles bore witness to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus[…].” How did they bear this witness: “[…] no one claimed that any of his possessions was his own, but they had everything in common […] There was no needy person among them […].” In other words, the apostles and those with them lived the death and resurrection of Christ with one heart and mind, dying to selfish want and rising to a new life in the Body. Did this public witness prove the truth of the faith? Not to everyone. But living the witness we proclaim, and not merely proclaiming it, tilts the scale of credibility heavily in our favor.
If our witness is to one faith, one baptism, one Lord, and we live as if there were many faiths, lots of baptisms, and multiple lords—a limitless diversity of opinion and unlimited options—then no one should believe us. If we proclaim a gospel of one heart and one mind in Christ, and then live as if there are countless hearts and numerous minds in many different Christs, no one should believe us. And no one will. We must lift up the Son of Man, Christ Jesus, not only with our tongues but with our hands as well. No other way will give our witness the weight of convincing truth.
2nd Week of Easter (T): Acts 4.32-37; John 3.7-15
Fr. Philip N. Powell, OP
Convento SS. Domenico e Sisto, Roma
If I were to tell you that I witnessed the student protests in Tiananmen Square in 1989, while teaching English in China, you might want to know how I felt and what I was thinking. If I were to tell you that I witnessed the end of WWII, the surrender of the Axis Powers to the Allies in 1945, you might begin to wonder a bit about my age. If I were to tell you that I witnessed Pontus Pilate abandon Christ to the brutal mercies of the crowd in first-century Jerusalem, you would smile sympathetically, pat me on the shoulder, and then tell your friends, “That Fr. Philip is a really nice guy, but sometimes he lies.” If then, I were to bear witness to Jesus’ death, burial, and resurrection from the dead, would you believe me? What is it that gives our witness the convincing weight of truth?
Nicodemus, Jewish political and religious leader, wealthy, upright citizen, approaches Jesus at night and poses several questions about the nature and necessity of being “born again.” In the dark of his night, Nicodemus seeks Christ’s light. Unfortunately, Jesus’ answers lead to more questions. Eventually, Jesus chastises Nicodemus, saying, “[…] we speak of what we know and we testify to what we have seen, but you people do not accept our testimony. If I tell you about earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you about heavenly things?” Jesus is putting the burden of belief on Nicodemus, chastising him for not accepting his witness to the truth of earthly things. But let’s look at it from Nicodemus’ view. What reason has Jesus given him to believe his testimony? What gives Jesus’ witness the convincing weight of truth?
Let’s bring this question home: why should anyone who does not believe the Church’s witness to Christ take our testimony about Christ as evidence for the truth of the gospel? Why should the non-believer believe you when you say, “Alleluia! Christ is risen!”? We have a hint in Acts: “The community of believers was of one heart and mind […] With great power the Apostles bore witness to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus[…].” How did they bear this witness: “[…] no one claimed that any of his possessions was his own, but they had everything in common […] There was no needy person among them […].” In other words, the apostles and those with them lived the death and resurrection of Christ with one heart and mind, dying to selfish want and rising to a new life in the Body. Did this public witness prove the truth of the faith? Not to everyone. But living the witness we proclaim, and not merely proclaiming it, tilts the scale of credibility heavily in our favor.
If our witness is to one faith, one baptism, one Lord, and we live as if there were many faiths, lots of baptisms, and multiple lords—a limitless diversity of opinion and unlimited options—then no one should believe us. If we proclaim a gospel of one heart and one mind in Christ, and then live as if there are countless hearts and numerous minds in many different Christs, no one should believe us. And no one will. We must lift up the Son of Man, Christ Jesus, not only with our tongues but with our hands as well. No other way will give our witness the weight of convincing truth.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)