I need a little help with a question about Aquinas' definition of truth in the Summa.
In my thesis I used what I thought was the definition of truth given by Thomas in the Summa: "Veritas logica est adaequatio intellectus et rei" (ST.I.21.2). Because I had seen this definition quoted in Maritain, Lonergan, the Catholic Encyclopedia, and the recent Davies/Leftow translation of the Prima pars, and a couple of other places, I didn't check the Latin text of the Summa to verify it (mea culpa!).
In my thesis I used what I thought was the definition of truth given by Thomas in the Summa: "Veritas logica est adaequatio intellectus et rei" (ST.I.21.2). Because I had seen this definition quoted in Maritain, Lonergan, the Catholic Encyclopedia, and the recent Davies/Leftow translation of the Prima pars, and a couple of other places, I didn't check the Latin text of the Summa to verify it (mea culpa!).
One of my inquisitors. . .ermmmm. . .I mean, examiners pointed out that this definition never appears in the Summa. The problem is the addition of the word logica in the definition quoted above.
Any ideas/suggestions/explanations out there about how the word logica got inserted into these sources?
Follow HancAquam & Check out my Wish List --------->