Didn't we listen to eight years of the bleating Left telling us that Bush was "shredding the Constitution" with the Patriot Act? I guess your definition of "shredding" depends on who sits in the Oval Office.
Hilarious: demographics of American newspapers. (NB. the embedded Youtube vid is mildly R-rated.)
Challenging the "Ron Paul's seat" mentality of a TX Republican primary. Apparently, Dems aren't the only ones infected with the politicus imperialis virus.
UK's Labour Party harboring Islamic radicals? Why not? European leftists seem pretty cozy with all sorts of delusional utopian ideologies.
More rhetorical slight-of-hand: using "men" to mean Bad Males vs. using "people" to mean Good Males. The definition of Good and Bad is, of course, political. (NB. I recently ordered, Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. Look for many more entries on the use and abuse of rhetoric!)
A meditation on suicide. We need you!
While failing to understand (much less love) western civilization, Harvard's liberal arts faculty sneers at the critical study of religion. One prof distinguishes between the phenomenon of religion and the use of reason as if reason cannot be used to study a phenomenon.
Dismantling the latest Elitist Meme: liberals and atheists are more intelligent than conservatives and theists. As you might suspect, the proof (or lack thereof) in it the definitions. Note especially the definition of "liberalism" that the researchers use. Poll after poll indicate that self-described conservatives are far more charitable with their money than liberals.
Sunday's homily is on its way!
Follow HancAquam ------------>
The difference in giving is unrelated to political ideology and instead related to religious practice. Religious people give, atheists don't. More liberals are atheists...
ReplyDeleteI guess your definition of "shredding" depends on who sits in the Oval Office.
ReplyDeleteNot mine, Father. I deplored it then and I do now. And I am emphatically NOT a leftist.
Romulus