"A [preacher] who does not love art, poetry, music and nature can be dangerous. Blindness and deafness toward the beautiful are not incidental; they are necessarily reflected in his [preaching]." — BXVI
04 June 2010
More Turista pics (links added)
Duh? I think you know this one.
Constantin's Arch right next to the Coliseum.
The Capitoline Museums
Church & State: The V.E.M. and Basilica di Santa Maria in Ara coeli
Il Turista (links added)
I played tourist today. . .here are just a few of the pics I took:
Down the Salita del Grillo toward the via Cavour. The wall on the right is one of the walls of Trajan's Market.
Vespasian's Forum of Peace. They still use the inside of this structure for concerts. To the right of this structure is the Basilica of Cosmas and Damian.
Guess. . .?
Part of the Old Roman Forum
Statue at the Capitoline Museums.
Trajan's Column with St Peter on top
Down the Salita del Grillo toward the via Cavour. The wall on the right is one of the walls of Trajan's Market.
Vespasian's Forum of Peace. They still use the inside of this structure for concerts. To the right of this structure is the Basilica of Cosmas and Damian.
Guess. . .?
Part of the Old Roman Forum
Statue at the Capitoline Museums.
Trajan's Column with St Peter on top
03 June 2010
Fishy Background
Who's that fishy in the window. . .of your laptop? One of the sample pics that came with the Window's OS.
Follow HancAquam ------------>
Follow HancAquam ------------>
Yet more pics
Proof that I can clean my desk!
(NB. This pic has been up for almost 12 hrs and I've not rec'd one appreciative comment from Scuba Becky, MightyMom, or my Lovely English Lady Friend! What's a friar gotta do? Mop the floor?!!)
University building for deans' offices and classrooms.
Two Angelicum students heading off to take exams. . .
02 June 2010
Pics from Angelicum's Eucharistic Adoration
Inside SS. Domenico e Sisto for Adoration after the 2010 annual Eucharistic Procession.
Nuns enough for ya? Adoration after the Procession.
(Pic credit: Fr. Benedict Croell, OP)
More Rome pics
The Angelicum's courtyard. . .the trees on the right are orange trees.
The Angelicum's backyard. . .which is really an orchard: orange, lemon, apple, pear, etc.
Rome Pics
I went down to the V.E.M. this morning to watch the National Day parades. . .but it was too crowded to see anything.
So, I snapped a few pics.
This is La Chiesa dei Santi Domenico e Sisto. . .and the entrance to the Angelicum. I had just missed getting our resident gypsy, Maria, in the pic.
31 May 2010
Coffee Bowl Browsing
President Thin Skin: "In Obama's eyes, he is always the aggrieved, always the violated, always the victim of some injustice." What else could he think given that his entire career has been one long series of exceptions being made by guilty white liberals?
Even Mother Nature is weary of his speechifying.
Alternative narratives to the "Evil Israeli Soldiers Slaughter Innocent Peace Activists" meme being pushed by the lefty media. Some commentary on this P.R. disaster. Predictable condemnations of Israel.
What if the euro/E.U. collapses? What would it mean for the U.S.?
Oops! An inconvenient truth about the anti-illegal immigrant law in AZ. . .CA citizens support it.
Licensing journalists? An idea that only Big Brother could love. Watch the MSM fall all over themselves loving this idea.
A hole to the center of the Earth? Is this the doorway through which the Apocalyptic Hordes of Zombies will shamble?
Yea, that was my reaction too!
Follow HancAquam ------------>
30 May 2010
What's a friar to wear?
Question: Just curious, is there any regulation regarding what Dominican friars wear under the habit?
Answer: Nope. The specifics of the habit itself are spelled out in the constitution, but what we wear underneath the habit is not. I wear shorts and a tee-shirt (even in winter) b/c of my tendency to overheat. I've seen jeans, black dress pants, PJ's, undertunics, khakis, clerics. Traditionally, we wear white socks and black shoes. However, you will see friars wearing everything from sandals to cowboy boots. By tradition, the habit is not to be decorated with pins, buttons, etc. Dominican bishops may wear the habit with their pectoral cross over the capuce. In Europe, you will sometimes see friars wearing the black skull cap. Jewelry is not forbidden, but you rarely see anything too conspicuous. Younger friars have taken to wearing a simple metal band on their left ring finger as a sign of consecration. Earrings would be frowned on! Before 1968, friars had to have permission to wear a beard. Since I'm headed back to Texas in a few weeks, I may test the waters on wearing a pistol on my belt. . . ;-)
Answer: Nope. The specifics of the habit itself are spelled out in the constitution, but what we wear underneath the habit is not. I wear shorts and a tee-shirt (even in winter) b/c of my tendency to overheat. I've seen jeans, black dress pants, PJ's, undertunics, khakis, clerics. Traditionally, we wear white socks and black shoes. However, you will see friars wearing everything from sandals to cowboy boots. By tradition, the habit is not to be decorated with pins, buttons, etc. Dominican bishops may wear the habit with their pectoral cross over the capuce. In Europe, you will sometimes see friars wearing the black skull cap. Jewelry is not forbidden, but you rarely see anything too conspicuous. Younger friars have taken to wearing a simple metal band on their left ring finger as a sign of consecration. Earrings would be frowned on! Before 1968, friars had to have permission to wear a beard. Since I'm headed back to Texas in a few weeks, I may test the waters on wearing a pistol on my belt. . . ;-)
Follow HancAquam ------------>
Rosaries for the novices
Generous benefactors have offered the purchase rosaries for our novices as simple profession gifts. . .
Can anyone suggest a good place in the U.S. to buy nice but not outrageously expensive rosaries to be worn with the OP habit, i.e., sturdy, fifteen decades?
Is there a Dominican monastery in the U.S. that makes rosaries? It would be a double gift if the rosaries could be purchased from our own nuns!
Mille grazie!
Follow HancAquam ------------>
28 May 2010
Coffee Bowl Browsing
Check out the new theology blog run by Sean DeWitt (a former student of mine) and Paul Bechter. Sean and Paul are seminarians at Holy Trinity Seminary in Irving, TX.
Finally! That preachy-leftist courtroom drama, Law and Order, is being canceled.
Is B.O.'s dream dead? "The new world order as envisioned by Obama in January 2009 was, I think, supposed to look something like the following: A social-democratic America would come to emulate the successful welfare states in the European Union." Unfortunately, for Obama, the E.U. experiment in socio-economic engineering has failed miserably. The one economic truth that wealth-redistributionists can't quite seem to grasp is that in order to give The Many the wealth of The Few, The Few have to be able to generate wealth. But redistributive economic policies discourage wealth generation. No wealth, no redistribution.
Thoughts on our legal drinking age. I was 19 when the age was raised to 21. I think 21 is too high. When U.D. students come to Rome for a semester in their sophomore year, they are legally old enough to drink in Italy. They seem to handle it quite well.
Peggy Noonan: "The president, in my view, continues to govern in a way that suggests he is chronically detached from the central and immediate concerns of his countrymen."
The New Atheists make a lot of ideological hay with the Church's handling of Copernicus and Galileo. Mark Shea helps us with some of the myths. I would also recommend the book, Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths about Science and Religion. This is a serious academic anthology published by Harvard Univ Press but written for an educated general audience.
If you are Catholic and subscribe to TIME Magazine. . .it's probably time to cancel your subscription. Yet another hit piece on the Holy Father.
Bill introduced in Congress to repeal ObamaCare. Will the GOP leadership screw this up? Probably.
University faculty unions? Academic faculties harbor some of the most pampered do-nothings in the universe! Why would they need to unionize? Prediction for fifty years out: the only place students will be able to get a serious liberal arts education will be small, independent Catholic colleges.
Proof that Big Nanny Statism can be thwarted.
Dissecting the Sestak/White House job offer scandal. . .crime and cover-up?
Italian police arrest notorious gay activist priest on charges of child sex abuse.
"I'm spiritual but not religious" is relativistic nonsense disguised as profundity.
This sad, then funny, then sad again. . .
Grand Unification Theory of Cutlery. . .I hope Burger King doesn't see this.
Kids answer the tough questions about romance, marriage, and parenthood.
Follow HancAquam ------------>
27 May 2010
Clarification on my K.C. post
There seems to be some confusion about my recent post on the Knights of Columbus controversy. So, let's make sure my thoughts are clear. . .
The Knights of Columbus helped me pay for my novitiate medical insurance. They contributed to several service projects I organized while at U.D. I have a great deal of respect and admiration for the Knights and their work.
I was asked by readers to respond to a very particular question: given the K.C.'s policy on not allowing local/state chapters to expel members who take public stands against Church teaching, should we consider resigning?
My answer was and still is: sure, consider it. . .but stay on and fight as long as your conscience allows it. In no way does my answer indicate a lack of respect for the Knights or an ignorance of the tremendous good that they do.
However, if the K.C. policy is morally wrong, no amount of good work will make it right. IOW, appeals to their long tradition of public service and dedication to the Church are irrelevant to the question of whether or not local and state chapters should be allowed to expel Knights who oppose Church teaching in ways that cause scandal.
Follow HancAquam ------------>
The Knights of Columbus helped me pay for my novitiate medical insurance. They contributed to several service projects I organized while at U.D. I have a great deal of respect and admiration for the Knights and their work.
I was asked by readers to respond to a very particular question: given the K.C.'s policy on not allowing local/state chapters to expel members who take public stands against Church teaching, should we consider resigning?
My answer was and still is: sure, consider it. . .but stay on and fight as long as your conscience allows it. In no way does my answer indicate a lack of respect for the Knights or an ignorance of the tremendous good that they do.
However, if the K.C. policy is morally wrong, no amount of good work will make it right. IOW, appeals to their long tradition of public service and dedication to the Church are irrelevant to the question of whether or not local and state chapters should be allowed to expel Knights who oppose Church teaching in ways that cause scandal.
Follow HancAquam ------------>
26 May 2010
The Knights of Columbus: to stay or go?
Dr. Jeff Mirus has it exactly right on the Knights of Columbus controversy:
It may be true that the first step toward a just social order is clear Catholic teaching by the clergy. But the second step is the day’s own trouble for the laity, the application of Catholic teaching in all the concrete dimensions of daily life. It is laymen who are expected to draw the lines that may not be crossed—not in terms of what the Church teaches, but in terms of the proper response when that teaching is ignored and our culture is subverted by those who participate in social and political life. It is laymen who are called to make it clear that if you want to be honored in our circles, you cannot campaign against what we stand for. And if you do, you will be corrected. And if you refuse correction, you will no longer be able to enjoy our company, our camaraderie, our sympathy and our support.
The whole article is here. I am especially impressed by Dr. Mirus' emphasis on the responsibility of the laity in defending Church teaching.
It may be true that the first step toward a just social order is clear Catholic teaching by the clergy. But the second step is the day’s own trouble for the laity, the application of Catholic teaching in all the concrete dimensions of daily life. It is laymen who are expected to draw the lines that may not be crossed—not in terms of what the Church teaches, but in terms of the proper response when that teaching is ignored and our culture is subverted by those who participate in social and political life. It is laymen who are called to make it clear that if you want to be honored in our circles, you cannot campaign against what we stand for. And if you do, you will be corrected. And if you refuse correction, you will no longer be able to enjoy our company, our camaraderie, our sympathy and our support.
The whole article is here. I am especially impressed by Dr. Mirus' emphasis on the responsibility of the laity in defending Church teaching.
I would emphasis one essential flaw in the KC's defense of their policy: critics of the policy are not asking the KC's to conduct investigations into the beliefs of every Knight in order to determine whether or not he is orthodox. The problem comes when Knights who are also public figures take stands against Church teaching. A Knight is a pro-abortion state governor not only risks his immortal soul by supporting abortion, he risks being held eternally responsible for those who may be lead to believe that since a Knight is pro-abortion, abortion must an acceptable practice in the eyes of the Church.
Whether or not any individual Knight should resign in protest against this policy boils down to a prudential judgment: will my resignation bring about a change in the policy? My choice would be to stay and fight. Work to change the policy through normal channels. There's always the chance that this will become a losing battle. Then you would have to make another judgment: am I giving my consent to the policy by remaining?
Follow HancAquam ------------>
When theologians play at being scientists (and vice-versa)
The two links below will take you to proof that the relationship between science and religion--when improperly understood--can lead to confusion in both science and religion.
Belief in divine creation is not the same as "intelligent design." The Intelligent Design Movement attempts to change the nature of normal science in order to account for divine creation, all the while claiming that this change is true to the nature of normal science. (H/T: Mark Shea)
A physicist corrects Jebbie theologian's confusion regarding quantum physics and transubstantiation. When theologians play at being scientists, like making the latest discoveries in physics foundational to theological discourse, they risk undermining the whole point of theology and making science into God. (H/T: Curt Jester)
Follow HancAquam ------------>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)