"A [preacher] who does not love art, poetry, music and nature can be dangerous. Blindness and deafness toward the beautiful are not incidental; they are necessarily reflected in his [preaching]." — BXVI
24 January 2014
23 January 2014
600,000+ say NO to abortion
All 500+ Archdiocese of New Orleans marchers made it back safely from D.C.
Thanks be to God!
Yours truly has been awake for almost 48 hrs. I'm hallucinating. . .I think.
Anyway, the March was a HUGE success.
Despite single-digit temps and the remains of a snow storm the night before, some 600,000 marchers descended on D.C. to let the Devil know that his "pro-choice" agenda is NOT the agenda of the next generation.
Though Catholics dominated the crowd in terms of numbers, I saw banners for Lutherans, Methodists, and Orthodox Christians.
The Pro-Life movement is truly ecumenical.
Thank you for your prayers and support. . .
Now. . .time for bed!
___________________
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
Thanks be to God!
Yours truly has been awake for almost 48 hrs. I'm hallucinating. . .I think.
Anyway, the March was a HUGE success.
Despite single-digit temps and the remains of a snow storm the night before, some 600,000 marchers descended on D.C. to let the Devil know that his "pro-choice" agenda is NOT the agenda of the next generation.
Though Catholics dominated the crowd in terms of numbers, I saw banners for Lutherans, Methodists, and Orthodox Christians.
The Pro-Life movement is truly ecumenical.
Thank you for your prayers and support. . .
Now. . .time for bed!
___________________
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
18 January 2014
March for Life: Contact the Media!
January 22, 2014 in Washington, D.C.
We will hear two kinds of noise on 1/22/14 coming out of D.C. The cheers/prayers of America's Pro-Life youth and the thundering chirps of Media Crickets.
Every year, the presence of 400,000+ Marchers for Life in the nation's capital is all but ignored by our anti-Christian MSM.
Challenge for You: contact major media outlets and ask them to cover the March for Life. Tell them that you will be writing again to ask why they didn't cover the event -- if they don't.
Making it easy for you to write:
Washington Post Reader Representative
New York Times News Tips
Wall Street Journal Digital Editor
CNN News Tip
ABC News Feedback
CBS News Contact Us
NBC Contact Us
Fox News News Tips
Send them an email, asking them to cover the M4L!
________________
17 January 2014
Called to be holy
Headed out tomorrow for DC and the March for Life. If I remember to pack my camera, I will post pics when we get back. The archdiocese is taking 500 CYO kids to the March! We'll be back on Thursday.
Here's a 2008 homily to tide y'all over. . .
2nd Sunday OT: Isa 49.3-6; 1 Cor 1.1-3; John 1.29-34
Fr. Philip Neri Powell, OP
St Paul Hospital, Dallas
John the Baptist, all the while running up and down the Jordan River baptizing folks for repentance in the name of Christ, freely admits upon seeing Jesus that he himself did not know Jesus! He
says though that he does know one thing about Jesus; he says, “…the
reason why I came baptizing with water was that [Jesus] might be made
known to Israel.” This episode from John’s gospel occurs after John has baptized Jesus, so now John knows exactly who and what Jesus is. More than a herald of the coming of the Lord, John is now a witness to the Lord’s presence among us. He
says, “I saw the Spirit come down like a dove from heaven and remain
upon him. . .he is the one who will baptize with the Holy Spirit. . .he
is the Son of God.” You may wonder why we are hearing about John the Baptist so soon after Christmas! He is the herald of Advent leading us to Christmas not a witness for Lent who leads us to Easter. We are hearing about the Baptist again so soon after Christmas b/c he makes a single confession of ignorance twice: “I did not know him. . .I did not know him. . .” You
might say, here on the verge of Ash Wednesday and Lent, John the
Baptist is showing us a way into the Lenten desert: do you know Christ?
There is no shame in confessing that you do not know Christ. You want to know Christ or you wouldn’t be here this morning. It’s likely that you know lots of facts about Christ. His first name: Jesus. His mom’s name: Mary. His dad: Joseph. You may know where he was born; where he lived and preached and taught; when and where he died. You may know all of the prophecies of his coming—Emmanuel, virgin mother, suffering servant, etc. And you may even know people who claim to know him well. But think for a moment about the difference between “knowing facts about Christ” and “knowing Christ.” Even John admits, “I did not know him. . .I did not know him. . .” But what John did know was that he was to baptize Jesus when he saw him so that all of Israel may be exposed to the unveiling of the Christ, the Son of God. How then do you know Christ? Factually or intimately?
I think this question makes Catholics a little nervous. It sounds very evangelical, very Protestant. The
question seems to come with a whole bags full of sticky emotions,
affective commitments, weepy testimonials, and a certain amount of
religious theater—you know, the preacher running around, shouting,
waving his arms, urging people to stand and clap. This
is the Protestant version of Catholic calisthenics (stand, bow, sit,
kneel, stand, bow, etc). Anyway, let me assure you that our Protestant
brothers and sisters have no monopoly on knowing Christ, nor do have
they cornered the market on asking whether or we know Christ. This is a universal question for Christians, a catholic question, if you will. John the Baptist comes to the fullest possible knowledge of Christ when the Holy Spirit points him out at the Jordan and says (more or less): “That’s him. Baptize him!” You
and I need to hear the question and struggle with an answer because we
are packing our things and looking toward the Lenten desert—that time we
set aside during the year to face the Devil’s temptations with Christ. Frankly, I want to know who’s with me when I face down the thousands of temptations that peck at me all year!
So, back to the question: do you know Christ? If so, how so? I don’t mean here “by what means do you know Christ;” I mean, what is the quality of your knowledge? Casually, formally, ritually, liturgically, morally, or perhaps, not at all. With regard to the means of knowing Christ, most of what we know we know from scripture, tradition, the magisterium. We are gifted with reason so that we may deduce certain knowledge. We can ask our clergy, our family, our friends. They can tell us some things we may not yet know. Bits and pieces that can be shared with words or gestures, or gifts. We can watch documentaries on A&E or read a library full of books. But finally, ultimately we have to know to what degree of intimacy, to what depth and breadth do we know him? This is a matter of our salvation b/c we were baptized with him in the Jordan. We were with him preaching, healing, feeding, suffering, and dying. We were with him on the cross and in the tomb. He rose up from the grave, leaving us his Holy Spirit, so that—yes absolutely—we will be with him again, rising to the Father! How do you know Christ?
Listen one more time to how Paul addresses the Corinthians in the first letter to them: “…to you who have been sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be holy, with those everywhere who call upon the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, their Lord and ours.” Did you catch that? To you who have been sanctified in Christ and “called to be holy…” The depth and breadth of our knowledge of Christ is best measured in our holiness. Our holiness. Not our piety. Not our morality. Not our adherence to the law. But in our holiness. We have the question “do you know Christ?” before us. Another way to ask the same question is this: are you holy? YIKES! What does that mean? Am I holy? Well, you might say, I love my family and friends. I go to Mass, confession, holy days of obligation. I’m pious. I’m moral. I obey the law. I’m a good person, generally speaking. But holy? Yes, are you holy? Here’s your job, brothers and sisters: become holy. If you are already holy, then become holier. You are, we all are, as capable of becoming holy as we are of breathing, eating, sleeping. How so?
Listen to what the Lord said to Isaiah, “You are my servant, Israel, through whom I show my glory.” As
baptized members of the Body of Christ, we are the people of his Word,
the tribe of David, the royal priesthood of his temple, the prophets of
his coming again. Listen again, “You are my
servant, Bob, Sue, Jill, Charles, Jeff, Fr. Philip, Richard, you are my
servants through whom I show my glory.” We know that only the Lord is good and holy. So the only way we may be good and holy is to show our Lord’s glory. The way Christ shows the Father’s glory. The way the Holy Spirit shows the Father’s glory. We must be a light to the nations so that the Lord’s salvation “may reach to the ends of the earth.” And we can do this precisely because we have been made holy in Christ Jesus and called to the life of the apostle in baptism. Please, be moral, pious, obedient, generous, but be and do all these to show the Lord’s glory. And show the Lord’s glory so that all may hear the call to holiness. That’s our job as members of the Body.
John did his job—baptizing with water for repentance—until the Holy Spirit called him to holiness in Christ. Then he baptized with Christ, showing everyone who came to him the sign of their calling: “Behold! Look there! The Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world.” Is this what we are doing? This is how we grow in the holiness that Christ died to give us. As you get closer to Lent, that deserted trek across our temptations to disobedience, freely confess, “I do not know Christ.” Take it as a temptation if you want to confess, “I do know Christ!” Why a temptation? Because we are growing in holiness. A
confession of ignorance is the humble means of knowing him better, more
deeply; it is the surer means of coming to the surer knowledge that you
are all at once planted, nurtured, pruned, cultivated, but not yet
harvested. All of the possibilities for our growth in holiness lie in this one confession: “Here am I, Lord! I come to do your will!”
_____________________
12 January 2014
Baptism of the Lord homily audio link
AUDIO LINK for "Just take the offer. . ." (Baptism of the Lord, 2014)
____________________
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
____________________
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
Just take the offer. . .
Baptism of the Lord
Fr. Philip Neri Powell, OP
John,
seeing Jesus standing in line to be baptized, must've been shocked.
No, not shocked. Thoroughly confused. Maybe even a little
intimidated. Here he is a simple prophet, carrying out his mission to
baptize repentant sinners in water, and up walks the fulfillment of
every messianic prophecy ever uttered in ancient scripture. As far as
we know, this is the first time Jesus and John have met since they
were both in their mothers' wombs—when John leaped with joy in the
presence of his savior. They know one another not by acquaintance nor
friendship but by the complementary gifts given them by the Father.
One goes before; the other comes after. One baptizes with water for
the remission of sins; the other baptizes with blood and fire for the
salvation of the world. At first, John hesitates to baptize his Lord,
saying, “I need to be baptized by you, and yet you are coming to
me?” In his shock, confusion, and fear John reveals the fundamental
movement of grace, the primitive motion of the Father's love for His
creatures: Christ comes to us. Before anything else happens in our
lives as followers of the Christ, Christ comes to us.
How
does Christ come to you, to me? Given our all-too-human tendency to
think that all things divine must be overwhelmingly dramatic, we
might expect that Christ comes to us in dazzling technicolor visions,
or from the midst of a great conflagration, or in a booming voice
while visiting a church. But notice how Isaiah describes the coming
Christ: “. . .he shall bring forth justice to the nations, not
crying out, not shouting, not making his voice heard in the street.”
No parades, no wailing over the Emergency Broadcast System, no
magical appearance at a Saints' game. He brings forth justice in a
whisper. He doesn't break a bruised reed when he walks nor does he
quench a smoldering wick when he breathes. So quiet, so gentle is his
coming to me and to you that we wait—like the coast lands—for his
teaching. The primitive motion of the Father's love for us is His
choice, His move towards us. Isaiah reports: “I, the Lord, have
called you for the victory of justice, I have grasped you by the
hand; I formed you. . .” I called you. I grasped your hand. I
formed you. Says the Lord. For the victory of justice—the victory
we share with Christ—is the Father's victory in Christ. He won for
us. And He sent His Son as a sign of His victory. Christ comes to
you, to me as a delicate triumph, as a small, singular success that
manages nonetheless to “open the eyes of the blind” and set
prisoners free.
The
Son of God is no prisoner to sin. So, when he approaches John for
baptism, John squawks, “But but but, you should be baptizing me!
And yet, you come to me?” Jesus—I always imagine that he
smiles—says, “Allow it now, for thus it is fitting for us to
fulfill all righteousness.” To fulfill all righteousness. Not a
phrase we hear everyday. What does Jesus mean? First, he means that
since he is the fulfillment of scripture's messianic prophecies, he
must do all that those prophecies require. Second, he means that
though he has no sin to repent, he still needs to show us the
necessity of repentance and baptism. And finally, he knows that his
baptism is to be followed by a revelation, a word spoken from heaven
confirming his identity and mission: “. . .he came up from the
water and behold, . . .a voice came from the heavens, saying, 'This
is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased.'” All
righteousness is fulfilled by this revelation. All is right with the
world b/c God's beloved Son is among us, sent to us for our
salvation. The long-wounded relationship btw creation and its Creator
is healed. You and I are approached by Christ and offered. .
.everything. Everything we need to live freely, to think truthfully,
to act justly, and to speak his Word of mercy to sinners.
Last
week, we celebrated the Epiphany of the Lord, the occasion of the
magi searching for and finding the newly born Jewish king. That these
Gentiles found him and offered him their homage tells us that the
king of the Jews is also the king of the Gentiles. Today we celebrate
the Lord's baptism and the final revelation of his identity and
mission: Christ is King and Christ is the Son of God. He rules heaven
and earth. And he rules not with fear or power or wealth but with his
teaching, his preaching, and his love for the poor in spirit. Peter
reminds his brothers and sisters in Acts that after he was baptized
by John and anointed by the Father “[Christ] went about doing good
and healing all those oppressed by the devil, for God was with him.”
Christ rule is liberation from power, fear, and the spiritual
oppression of things. We are approached and offered freedom.
Approached and offered healing. He will not rule a heart that is not
first given to him freely. He will not rule a mind that is not first
turned toward him. He brings forth justice with a whisper. He doesn't
break a bruised reed when he walks nor does he quench a smoldering
wick when he breathes.
This
can be both good and bad news for us. Good news b/c who wants to be
coerced into being free? Bad news b/c we must be attentive enough to
hear his approach and offer. This bad news, however, really isn't all
that bad. Part of my job as a preacher is to make sure that you know
that there's an offer on the table. And make sure that you understand
the offer and the consequences of accepting that offer. So, here
goes. There's an offer from Christ in front of you. He's approached
you—each one of us—and laid before us a simple proposition: we
repent of our sins, get baptized, and follow him, and eternal life
awaits us when this life is done. Unlike the magi, we don't have to
go searching for him. Unlike John, we aren't surprised that he's come
to us. We don't owe him anything. We don't have to put up any
collateral or sign away an organ or a child to follow. Repent. Get
baptized. Follow him. He's not going to shout or jump or promise us
great wealth or a better looking spouse. In fact, and here's the hard
part of my job, following him in this world is a promise of conflict,
persecution, trial, and near-constant opposition. When we pick up his
offer and follow him, we become an irritant to the world. This isn't
surprising. Christ himself is the Cosmic Irritant, and the world
convulses to dig him out. Why would you or I be spared?
With
all the conflict, trial, and persecution, you might rightly wonder
how a follower of Christ is supposed to accomplish his/her mission to
speak the Word of God's mercy to sinners. Isaiah prophesied in the
desert and on the street corner. John baptized in a local river.
Jesus preached on hills, from a boat, and in the market. The world
tells you to be quiet. The world fears your good deeds. The world
wants you to be embarrassed by the cross. It's the world that tells
us that our faith is a “private matter.” It's the world that
tells us that we believe in fairy-tales and tribal myths. And what
does the world offer instead? Power, influence, wealth, celebrity.
Corrupting power, compromising influence, dirty wealth, and fleeting
celebrity. All to weigh down your soul and keep you enslaved. . .to
what? Nothing eternal, nothing permanent. A lust for more? More
corruption? More compromise? Our God has called us, grasped us by the
hand, and formed us to be “a light for the nations, to open the
eyes of the blind,” to live and breath His victory of justice. Take
His offer and He will say on the last day, “These are my beloved
children, with whom I am well pleased.”
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
The Jesus Gym
NB. A never-preached Roman homily from 2010. I may tweak this one and give it a shot tonight. . .thoughts?
Baptism of the Lord
Fr. Philip Neri Powell, OP
SS. Domenico e Sisto, Roma
When hearing confessions or
giving spiritual direction to university students—especially men—I
frequently draw an analogy between developing spiritually and developing
physically. Most of us have no illusions about what it takes to lose
weight, build muscle, increase stamina, and get ourselves to the point
where we are as fit as we can be. The whole unpleasant process begins
with radical changes to the diet. Slowly increasing exercise. Maybe
even a little weight-lifting. If you've ever started down this road,
you know that you will not drop 25lbs in a week, nor will you be able to
show off a six-pack by the weekend. Getting a flabby, overweight,
diet-stressed body into some kind of shape requires determination,
focus, commitment, and lots and lots of time. It wouldn't hurt if you
had someone with experience to help. A professional trainer. A coach.
Even a friend who knows how to keep you motivated. All of this applies
to our spiritual growth as well. Being Catholics, we understand the
sacramental nature of creation: the physical world is a sign of the
spiritual, an imperfect revelation of God that both points to God's
presence and makes Him present to us. We cannot, therefore, rightly
divide the human body from the human soul and expect our spiritual lives
to be fruitful. Just as the body needs proper diet, exercise, and a
little hard-lifting, the soul needs its strength-training too.
We start our life-long regime at
The Jesus Gym on the day we are baptized. From that moment on, “the
grace of God has appeared, saving all and training us to reject godless
ways and worldly desires and to live temperately, justly, and devoutly
in this age. . .” As Catholics, we don't have any trouble understanding
grace as divine help, a gift from God to assist us when we need it.
What we do have trouble understanding sometimes is that the help we get
isn't always the help we want. Like the skinny 18 year old freshman who
wants ripped abs in a week to impress his girlfriend, we sometimes
approach the throne in prayer and ask not for assistance to accomplish
some goal, but rather we ask God to accomplish the goal for us, instead
of us. The freshman is very disappointed to hear that his six-pack will
take a semester or two with lots of hard work. And we are no less
disappointed to learn that grace does not prevent us from traveling the
ways of the godless nor desiring what the world would have us desire.
Instead, grace trains us how to be godly men and women. The hard work
of chiseling out a ripped spiritual six-pack is all ours. But we do not
work alone.
And not only do we not work
alone, we cannot work alone. Christianity is a team sport. We play as a
team, so we train as a team and the perfect model for teamwork is the
Holy Trinity: three divine persons, one God. The more perfectly we
imitate this model of Love in action, we closer we get to that Jesus Gym
spirit we've been wanting. As noted above, the first step on this new
regime is baptism. I did not baptize myself. Nor did any of you. The
Church baptized us all with parents, godparents, friends, fans,
by-standers, accidental tourists, all the angels and saints—every one in
attendance. And because we were baptized by the Church, we might think
that the only thing we got for our trouble is a life-long membership to
the Jesus Gym. As wonderful as that is, it's not even close to the
full baptismal package. Paul writes to Titus, “[God] saved us through
the bath of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit, whom he richly
poured out on us through Jesus Christ our savior, so that we might be
justified by his grace and become heirs in hope of eternal life.”
First, notice: God saved. . .He poured out. We did nothing (nor could
we do anything) to initiate the renewal of our relationship with God.
It was His move and His alone. Second, notice: through Christ, by the
Holy Spirit, through our Savior, by his grace. Christ Jesus is the only
mediator, the only mechanism; he is the only way. Third, notice: us,
us, our, we, heirs. Not “Me & Jesus.” Not “Jesus, MY Personal Lord
& Savior.” His grace is poured out on US. . .WE are saved by the
bath of rebirth and the renewal of the Holy Spirit. . .Christ is OUR
Savior. . .And WE are made HEIRS in hope of eternal life. This is what
baptism does for us and to us: we are made just (righteous), so that we
might work with God's abundant graces to get our spiritual bodies into
the best shape possible.
But even before we can be
baptized in water and the Spirit; even before we can be offered the
chance at a right-relationship with the Father through Christ; even
before it is possible for us to be heirs to hope in eternal life. . .The
Jesus Gym must have a grand opening. It only makes sense. Plans were
laid long ago with the prophets. They rounded up the initial investors.
After a few false teachers and at least one wash-out (ahem), momentum
starting building. Finally, the Plan was conceived and announced. And
before it was fully born, there was one enthusiastic booster. Then,
with some astronomical fanfare and a couple of sheep, the Plan was born,
drawing its first foreign investors twelve days later. With this
starting capital and two excellent CEO's, the Plan matured for a while
and opened for business for the first time at a wedding in Cana. . .but
the Grand Opening, the opening that makes The Jesus Gym not just another
gym but The Gym for all peoples, tribes, nations, and tongues, this
opening takes place at the River Jordan where Jesus' first booster
baptizes him with water and then the Father baptizes him with His
Spirit, saying, “You are my beloved Son; with you I am well pleased.”
Now, The Jesus Gym is open for business.
If, after all the bad
analogizing, you are still listening, let me quickly tell you why Jesus
was baptized. Here's a nice summary from the CCC: “The baptism of
Jesus is on his part the acceptance and inauguration of his mission as
God's suffering Servant. He allows himself to be numbered among
sinners;. . .Already he is anticipating the 'baptism' of his bloody
death. Already he is coming to 'fulfill all righteousness,' that is, he
is submitting himself entirely to his Father's will: out of love he consents to this baptism of death for the remission of our sins.
. .”(n. 536). Remember, earlier we said that the Holy Trinity is the
perfect model of teamwork. By imitating the work of the Trinity we come
closer to the spiritual perfection for which we were made. By
submitting to baptism, Christ demonstrated his acceptance of his
Father's plan for our salvation. This shouldn't sound all that unusual:
three divine persons, one God—perfect Love in action. The Son
submits in love to take on human flesh in order to bring the Father's
offer of renewal to us. And not only does he deliver the invitation, he
becomes our sin; dies for us; rises again to the Father; and sends the
Holy Spirit as our guide. The whole of his public ministry, inaugurated
by the River Jordan, was to proclaim the Father's invitation and to
leave us a body of teaching that serves to reveal what grace in action
look likes. The Gospels answer the question: what does the perfected
follower of Christ look like? Out of love, she dies for her friends.
Grace trains us for the godly
life. What is the godly life? It is not scrupulous moral behavior. It
is not meticulous orthodoxy. It is not righteous anger at injustice.
It is not any one of these alone. The godly life is the life Christ
left for us to follow. The godly life begins with baptism, grows with
the Church, and ends with “Out of love, he ____for his friends.” How
you fill in that blank will depend on how well you used your time and
strength at The Jesus Gym. Most of us will spend our lives trying to
decide if we have the courage to put “died” or “suffered” in that blank.
Grace trains. But you have to do the work.
_____________________Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
11 January 2014
ON Lumps and Alien Babies
Insomnia strikes again. . .as it regularly does.
The Lump has shrunk down to an annoying bump.
I noticed last night that a blood vessel in my right eye had burst.
Of course, I immediately started having visions of an alien baby gestating in my head. Why waste perfectly good imaginative energy worrying about something as mundane as a stroke, right?
Anyway, I now have lots of time to finish up notes for Monday's classes and start on tomorrow's homily.
_________________________
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
10 January 2014
Diseased Face Update
The Lump has shrunk even more this morning.
Anti-b's and megadoses of Vit C are doing the job.
And I am sure the prayers of HA readers are scaring the snot of The Lump.
Not literally, of course. . .at least, not yet.
_____________________
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
Anti-b's and megadoses of Vit C are doing the job.
And I am sure the prayers of HA readers are scaring the snot of The Lump.
Not literally, of course. . .at least, not yet.
_____________________
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
09 January 2014
On the travails of infection
Prayers, please!
Woke up yesterday with the left side of my face swollen.
Went to the Jr. E.R. and found out that I have what appears to be an infected whisker follicle.
Doc gave me an anti-biotic shot and a Rx for oral anti-b's.
Today, the swollen area has shrunk, but it has become more solid, harder.
And the meds are making me queasy.
So, who's the Patron Saint of Swollen Faces?
________________________
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
07 January 2014
Satan in OK City?
Posted without comment b/c. . .errrmmmm. . .I just can't.
__________________________
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
__________________________
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
05 January 2014
What gifts do you bring?
The Epiphany of the Lord
Fr. Philip Neri Powell, OP
Our Lady of the Rosary, NOLA
Upon
seeing the child with Mary his mother, the three magi prostrated
themselves to pay him homage and – in the words of Matthew –
“Then they opened their treasures.” Then they opened their
treasures. These treasures were gold, frankincense, and myrrh. Gold
for a king. Incense for a god. And myrrh for a corpse. Without really
knowing what they are doing, the magi give to Jesus gifts that reveal
him to be the Son of God, the Christ. And not only do they reveal his
true nature, they also reveal his mission. Here's the epiphany, the
revelation we celebrate this evening: the newly born Jewish king is
king of the Jews and the Gentiles. He is born to rule both the oldest
nation under God and the newest. He is born to rule in the hearts and
minds of all men and women. Not just those under Abraham's covenant
with God, but all those who would bring him gifts and pay him homage
as Lord and Savior. The magi came from the east in search of a king.
They find a child. They prostrate before him. Then they open their
treasures. What treasures do you offer the new born king? Gold,
frankincense, and myrrh reveal the Son of God and the Son of Man in
one flesh, born to die for us. What do our gifts given to Christ say
about who we believe him to be?
The
magi believe that the star will lead them to the newly born Jewish
king. King Herod believes the magi know their business and ask them
to report back to him when they find this new king. It's difficult to
imagine that the magi would travel hundred of miles to search for an
infant if they did not truly believe that this infant is quite
special. It's also difficult to believe that Herod would order the
deaths of thousands of baby boys if he didn't believe that this
infant posed a threat to his rule. Both Herod and the magi know that
the child born under the Bethlehem star is a king. Yet, the magi
bring him three gifts that reveal his true nature as the Christ,
while Herod would gift him with a sword through his heart. The magi
offer Christ the deference due a master. Herod offers a death due a
thief. In the end, on the cross, both the magi and Herod are
vindicated. Christ dies a king, but he dies like a criminal. The
gifts given to Christ by the magi and Herod tell us who they believe
him to be. What do your gifts given to Christ say about who you
believe him to be?What treasures do we offer the new born king?
Now,
when I say “treasures” I mean more than money. More than what you
might put in the collection plate. Every gift we have to share is
first a gift to us from God. Starting with our very existence and on
to all of our talents and treasure, everything we have and are is a
gift from God. When the magi offer the Christ Child their royal
gifts, they are offering him their material best. Had they stuck
around for thirty years or so they might have offered him their
talents as well – the loyal service of their knowledge and wisdom.
And why wouldn't they? They revealed the King of the Jews as the
Savior of the whole world, including their world. Maybe we should
back up a bit and find out what gifts we have to give. Not everyone
has a nearly bottomless checking account. Nor we do need one to be
generous. Not everyone is happily retired and free most of the day to
volunteer. Not everyone can sing, write, organize. Some of us are
better at comforting the sick and mourning. Some with children and
the elderly. A few of us are good teachers; good with helping those
in serious trouble; good with machines and tools. The gifts we have
are given to us by God to use. For His glory not ours. When we use
our gifts we reveal Christ to one another. The magi reveal him to be
the King of all nations. Who is he?
He
is our king and our savior and our Lord. So, what gifts do we offer
Christ? Well, who do you believe he is? What do you believe he does
for you? Is he a lucky charm or a friendly ghost? A wise teacher or
an enlightened soul? An historical figure who you just like hearing
about? Or is he who he says he is: the Son of God, the Messiah come
to die for our sins and bring us into the holy family of his Father?
Do our gifts to him serve as a confession of faith in him? This is
all much more than just a reminder to do good deeds, or an admonition
to be nice to one another. What we are talking about here is nothing
less than how we decide to reveal Christ to the world. On the
shoulders of the Church as a whole and each of her members is the
burden of being Christ in the world. Not just saying Christ-like
stuff. Not just doing Christian-type stuff at Mass. But actually
going out there and showing the world who and what Christ is. When
the people of the world look at us, at you, at me do they see who and
what Christ is for them? Do they understand that he died for them so
that they might live? Do they watch us and see us living lives of
sacrificial love for one another and for them? If we are not
revealing Christ to the world, then what are we doing?
What
I am doing? I don't know. Maybe I'm revealing that Christ is all
about the show, all about the noise of morality. Maybe I'm revealing
that Christ is all about the technicalities of canon law and
liturgical rubrics. Maybe I'm revealing that Christ died on the cross
so that I might live in a religious ghetto where no one bothers my
delicate sensibilities. I don't think that this is what I am
revealing. I hope not! I hope my gifts to Christ reveal him to be the
source and summit of the Father's mercy and love; the fount from
which all hope and surrender flow. I want my gifts to reveal a Christ
who teaches the way back to God and the truth of our eternal lives.
Like the magi, I want my gifts to be more than just my material best.
I want them to be signs of my homage, my respect, my worship. I want
them to show the world that he is who he says he is. But to do that,
my gift must be my life given over in sacrificial love. That's what
he wants from me, that's what he's ask for. Not gold or incense or
myrrh or a bigger collection check or a week of good deeds or a
wonderfully sung hymn. He wants your life. Given for another. In
sacrificial love. That's the gift to him that reveals him to the
world as the Christ.
The
magi sought and found a king, bringing him three royal gifts. King
Herod sought but never found a threat to his throne. His gift? A
bloodied sword. What gifts do you bring to give to Christ? What you
bring to give him reveals who and what you believe him to be. Do not
for a second believe that Christ needs our money or our time or our
talents. He doesn't. He needs nothing from us. In fact, everything we
have to give him came from him. It's the giving that matters. It's
what the giving reveals about our trust in him, our hope in him, our
love for him that matters. You are the best gift to give him b/c
everything you have and everything you are was given to his Father on
the cross. You already belong to him. So, leave here this evening and
reveal Christ to your world. How? By being Christ for those who seek
him out. Be their epiphany, their revelation of God's mercy and love.
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
On Being Replaced by a More Faithful Generation
Exactly right!
From Renewal: How a New Generation of Faithful Priests and Bishops is Revitalizing the Catholic Church. . .
The infighting continues as the aging generations of progressive
Catholics continue to lobby the Church’s leaders to change her teachings
on reproductive rights, same-sex marriage, and women’s ordination. Yet
they are being replaced with a new generation of young faithful
Catholics who are attracted to the Church because of the very
timelessness of these teachings. These younger Catholics are attracted
to orthodoxy. But it is not a reactionary or backward-looking orthodoxy.
Rather, it is an orthodoxy that longs for the noblest ideals and
achievements of the Church—the philosophy, the art, the literature, and
the theology that make Catholicism countercultural (9).
If this younger generation of faithful priests and bishops can maintain both their theological orthodoxy and their evangelical zeal, then we will see the Church revived in a big way. However, if theological orthodoxy is allowed to become little more than propositional repetition, then we will see something akin to the immediate post-VC2 period -- theological, moral, and liturgical chaos, a return to the Cultural Revolution (a la Maoist China) that left the Church empty, dispirited, and useless.
_____________________
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
04 January 2014
Spiritual Entropy
Drawing your attention to an excellent article over at The Imaginative Conservative, "Daydreams, Nightmares, and Christian Realism."
The opening paragraph (with a few editions):
As we look at our present nihilistic culture, malnourished in the absence of [faith and reason] and living only on a meager diet of [bread and games] it
is hard to perceive any sign of true progress, unless we see progress
as synonymous with suicide. Whether the homicide, genocide, and
infanticide of secular fundamentalism can be seen as its own ultimate
suicide, there is no need for the rest of us to follow such
self-destructive notions of “progress”. On the contrary, as Chesterton
reminds us, “true progress consists in looking for a place where we can
stop”, which, in the dark ages in which we now live, means a place
where we can stop the rot.
Pearce explores the notion of Original Sin and the myth of human progress (properly understood).
Well worth your time.
___________________Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
What's Dangerous About Christianity? (Updated)
Insomnia last night. I started thinking again. Happens every time.
So, here's what got me thinking: Christianity's Dangerous Idea.
It took me a few decades to resolve a basic question about myself: who do you want to be?
I didn't say to myself, "Self, be the most dangerous person you can be!" That sort of response strikes me as incredibly pretentious. (I can hear Scuba Mom yelling at me, "GET IN HERE AND PICK UP YOUR DIRTY SOCKS, FATHER! NOW!" So much for pretense).
Anyway, let's assume for a moment that Christianity -- in all of it many forms -- is indeed a Dangerous Idea. Hitchens (in the link above) argues that Christianity is a dangerous idea b/c Christians believe that Jesus is the Son of God and that he rose from the dead. Start with this idea and things get scary quick.
My question to you: as a Christian, what do you think is dangerous about Christianity and why?
Leave your response in the combox, and I will tack it on the post as an update.
I feel a lot of good homily material coming my way!
Response from Anon: Christianity is dangerous because it demands that we conform ourselves to something external, or better, to Someone external. Our lives are not our own to dispose of as we wish. God makes demands of us, and He has the right to do so because He made us. Because He recognizes that we are sinful, in His mercy He has given us the Sacraments as the means to become fortified in grace and to become reconciled with Him. Even so, we squander graces more than we realize and continue to stumble in our sinfulness. Christianity teaches us to tame our wills, probably the most challenging demand ever made, and for many, a demand too radical for the human ego to abide.
Response from Gregg the Obscure: Christianity is dangerous because it requires us to forgive those who trespass against us.
Response from Shelly: Truth is always dangerous, and Christianity has the Truth and is not shy about speaking it, which angers those who hope to disregard Truth and "change reality" to fit their own agendas.
Love can also be dangerous, since Christianity speaks of loving as the Lord loves us, even to loving one's enemies - how can you encourage others to be jealous, or hate, or subjugate, or take advantage, of others when love is an over-riding concern?
And Christianity speaks to a Higher Power - the Highest Power - to whom Christians look for guidance...Christianity does not look to the world as the end of all things. There is more. And since that "more" is more important than anything here on this earth, then it is very difficult for an outside power to coerce Christians to follow along if the path being shown does not lead to Heaven.
Dangerous to those who want power, who want to control humanity ....
Response from cmom: It localizes one's existence in God rather than the state.
Response from Keith: In today's America, it is dangerous because it points out that those who are to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, tend the sick and visit the prisoners, are those of us who are Christians. Christ, insofar as I can determine from Sacred Scripture, never enjoined us to petition Caesar (in whatever form is contextually relevant) to take what God has bestowed upon us as individuals and families and establish public structures to see to those duties. If that understanding is correct and were it to be followed there are a large number of people, including but by no means limited to, those who are employed by Caesar's bureaus, departments, etc., to effect the delivery of those goods and services. That alone, if it were followed, would make a substantial number of our fellow citizens extremely unhappy.
Response from Pat: Christianity is dangerous because when you realize that God loves you enough to become human and die on a cross for you, that requires an unconditional response on you part.
Response from Suzanne: Well consider that Christ was crucified for preaching love. God's love. That is what is dangerous. God's love is what messes up everybody's thoughts and plans. And the world is ready to crucify you for it.
Response from Melissa: Christianity is dangerous because it can devastate one's financial bottom line. Imagine what would happen if a huge corporation actually took Christ's demands to heart! Fair pay, no unnecessary work on Sundays, charity to the poor, love instead of competition . . . No wonder American society is so opposed to Christianity!
Response from Matheus: I find this to be an enormously complex issue, but what comes to my mind right now is that it is dangerous because it definitely sets one apart from a worldly existence. The very concept of God Himself fully becoming a man, and then facing excruciating torture and death for our sake renders not only life itself, but everything even remotely pertaining to it "new" and "special" (for shameful lack of better words), therefore obligatorily changing the way it is lived on every possible level.
_________________Response from Anon: Christianity is dangerous because it demands that we conform ourselves to something external, or better, to Someone external. Our lives are not our own to dispose of as we wish. God makes demands of us, and He has the right to do so because He made us. Because He recognizes that we are sinful, in His mercy He has given us the Sacraments as the means to become fortified in grace and to become reconciled with Him. Even so, we squander graces more than we realize and continue to stumble in our sinfulness. Christianity teaches us to tame our wills, probably the most challenging demand ever made, and for many, a demand too radical for the human ego to abide.
Response from Gregg the Obscure: Christianity is dangerous because it requires us to forgive those who trespass against us.
Response from Shelly: Truth is always dangerous, and Christianity has the Truth and is not shy about speaking it, which angers those who hope to disregard Truth and "change reality" to fit their own agendas.
Love can also be dangerous, since Christianity speaks of loving as the Lord loves us, even to loving one's enemies - how can you encourage others to be jealous, or hate, or subjugate, or take advantage, of others when love is an over-riding concern?
And Christianity speaks to a Higher Power - the Highest Power - to whom Christians look for guidance...Christianity does not look to the world as the end of all things. There is more. And since that "more" is more important than anything here on this earth, then it is very difficult for an outside power to coerce Christians to follow along if the path being shown does not lead to Heaven.
Dangerous to those who want power, who want to control humanity ....
Response from cmom: It localizes one's existence in God rather than the state.
Response from Keith: In today's America, it is dangerous because it points out that those who are to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, tend the sick and visit the prisoners, are those of us who are Christians. Christ, insofar as I can determine from Sacred Scripture, never enjoined us to petition Caesar (in whatever form is contextually relevant) to take what God has bestowed upon us as individuals and families and establish public structures to see to those duties. If that understanding is correct and were it to be followed there are a large number of people, including but by no means limited to, those who are employed by Caesar's bureaus, departments, etc., to effect the delivery of those goods and services. That alone, if it were followed, would make a substantial number of our fellow citizens extremely unhappy.
Response from Pat: Christianity is dangerous because when you realize that God loves you enough to become human and die on a cross for you, that requires an unconditional response on you part.
Response from Suzanne: Well consider that Christ was crucified for preaching love. God's love. That is what is dangerous. God's love is what messes up everybody's thoughts and plans. And the world is ready to crucify you for it.
Response from Melissa: Christianity is dangerous because it can devastate one's financial bottom line. Imagine what would happen if a huge corporation actually took Christ's demands to heart! Fair pay, no unnecessary work on Sundays, charity to the poor, love instead of competition . . . No wonder American society is so opposed to Christianity!
Response from Matheus: I find this to be an enormously complex issue, but what comes to my mind right now is that it is dangerous because it definitely sets one apart from a worldly existence. The very concept of God Himself fully becoming a man, and then facing excruciating torture and death for our sake renders not only life itself, but everything even remotely pertaining to it "new" and "special" (for shameful lack of better words), therefore obligatorily changing the way it is lived on every possible level.
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
02 January 2014
Fat Kid in a Candy Store, or A Dominican in a Bookstore
Just made it back to New Orleans after a two week visit amongst the Squirrels. . .oh, and I said hi a couple of times to the Parentals and Family. . .
Upon entering the cloister of the priory, I was greeted by a stack of Amazon packages from the Wish List.
I'm not going to say I didn't squeal -- it was very manly -- but I did emit a high-pitched squeak that some might mistake for a delighted squeal.
Here's a pic of me after opening the boxes:
Thanks to Michelle R. and Jenny K. (my two favoritest Book Angels) for making my After Christmas Party a mendicant delight.
___________________Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
01 January 2014
31 December 2013
Mother of Our Freedom!
Solemnity of Mary, the Holy Mother of God
Fr. Philip Neri Powell, OP
Our Lady of the Redneck Squirrels, MS
Listen Here (8.00am Mass)
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
Fr. Philip Neri Powell, OP
Our Lady of the Redneck Squirrels, MS
Listen Here (8.00am Mass)
We call her "Advocate of Eve," "Seat
of Wisdom," "Cause of Our Joy," "Help of Christians," and "Mother of
Sorrows." We greet her in prayer, “Hail, Mary! Full of grace!” And we
call upon her intercession using a variety of names: Our Lady of
Guadalupe, Our Lady of Knock, Queen of the Americas, and Our Lady of
Prompt Succor. But all these titles and names are meaningless unless we
understand the one title that makes all the others possible: Theotokos,
God-bearer, the one who gives birth to God. Mary is who and what she
is for us b/c she is first and foremost the Holy Mother of God. This
title was settled upon in 431 A.D. by the Church Fathers at the Council
of Ephesus. Fighting back a heresy that wanted us to believe that the
Christ was actually two different persons—one human and one divine—the
Fathers declared that Christ is just one divine person with two natures
(human and divine). Mary gave birth to the divine person of Jesus
Christ, making her the mother of God Incarnate. And since we never
celebrate a Marian feast w/o remembering the One to Whom Mary always
points us, we also celebrate her son, Jesus, the Messiah. Given all
this, I'd like to propose another title for Mary: Mother of Our
Freedom! Why this title? Paul writes to the Galatians, “When the
fullness of time had come, God sent his Son, born of a woman. . .so that
we might receive adoption as sons. . .So you are no longer a slave but a
son, and if a son then also an heir, through God.”
We are no longer slaves but
sons, heirs; and made so by God through the faithful cooperation of
Mary. The Mother of Our Freedom cooperated (operated with) the Holy
Spirit and received into her womb the seed of the Word, which grew into
the divine person of Jesus. His birth into human history and his death
into eternal life makes our salvation possible. He cuts a path through
the thorny tangle of sin and death and draws us behind him to be taken
up, made holy, and seated at our inherited place at the banquet table of
God. Our release from the slavery of sin, our escape from the
inevitability of death is accomplished by Christ through the cooperation
of Mary. She is the Mother of Our Freedom b/c she gave birth to the
only means of our freedom. From slaves to heirs, we move ever closer to
the perfection of Christ.
Our perfection in Christ is both
our work and the work of God. Just like our Blessed Mother cooperated
with the work of the Holy Spirit to conceive and give birth to Jesus, we
too are vowed to cooperate with the work of the Holy Spirit to conceive
and give birth to the Word, making his flesh and blood our flesh and
blood; surrendering our hearts and minds, and our hands and voices to
the holy work of preaching and teaching the Good News to the world. The
longer and harder we work at accomplishing this task, the higher we
climb in holiness and the deeper we delve into divine wisdom. Like the
shepherds who find the Holy Family in the manger and “made known the
message that had been told them about [the Christ],” we too are vowed to
finding Christ, following him, and making his message known. After
seeing the Christ-child, the shepherds go home, “glorifying and praising
God for all they had heard and seen.” And we too will return home, our
heavenly home, glorifying and praising God, if we do what we have
promised as followers of Christ to do. Mary held on the message of the
shepherds, reflecting on it in her heart, remembering Simeon's warning
in the temple that her heart would be pierced by the sufferings of her
son. While the shepherds adored and the people were amazed, Mary
quietly grieved, knowing the destiny of the one sent to redeem us all
from the slavery of sin.
Mary's grief must have been
nearly unbearable. Having assented to the conception of the Word and
given him birth, she is left with the sure knowledge that her son is the
long-awaited Messiah, the One who would suffer and die for the sins of
men. To gain our freedom, the Mother of Our Freedom had not only to
bear the Christ into this world, she had to witness his suffering and
death for our sakes. And not only was she a witness to his passion, she
suffered along with him as any mother would. Her heart, pierced by the
sword of grief, bled out even as Jesus bled out on the cross. As
painful as his death and her grief no doubt were, as a result, we rose
as a race to be the adopted children of the Father, heirs to His
kingdom. Granted the inheritance of the ages, in possession of God's
promise of eternal life, and the possibility of perfection through His
Christ, what do we do in order to give thanks? How do mere creatures
show appreciation to the One who created and re-created them? There is
nothing we can do or say that would equal this gift, that would express
the enormity of this sacrifice for us. We are left to do only that
which we have already vowed to do: bring the message of God's love and
mercy to the world in all we do, say, think, and feel. Despite
opposition, persecution, ridicule, and violence, we deliver the message
that Christ is Lord! When we do as Christ did, and speak as he spoke,
we grow closer to our perfection in him.
Some 1,600 years ago, a council
of Church Fathers hashed out a theological statement that confirmed what
most Christians at the time already believed: that Mary is the Holy
Mother of God Incarnate. As the mother of God, she bore into the world
the Son who grew up to teach and preach the saving word of his Father's
mercy to sinners. Not only did he teach and preach his Father's mercy,
he embodied that mercy; he gave that mercy flesh and bone and walked
among us as a sign of contradiction, a rock upon which men's hearts and
minds would be broken to reveal the truth inside. When confronted with
the raw truth that your sins are forgiven and that you are no longer a
slave to sin, the truth that dwells secretly within breaks out and
flourishes in the light of Christ. The shepherds wandered the desert on
the word of an angel until they found Christ. The truth in their
hearts dropped them to their knees in adoration. Those near the manger,
the ones who heard the shepherds' message, had their hardened hearts
softened and exposed. They were left amazed by the Good News. Mary,
Mother of Sorrows, had her heart broken on the knowledge that her son
would suffer and die. The truth in her heart led her to a life of
humble service to the Lord. Within the Body of Christ, his Church,
there is a truth that will renew us, a truth that will bring us to
remember our vows, and urge us to rededicate ourselves to the hard work
that Mary started when she said Yes to God. That truth is this: each
of us and all of us together are the flesh and blood of God's Word, not
just people who believe or people who do good works, but the People of
God who walk out into the world to be—however imperfect—Christs for one
another. Mary, Mother of Our Freedom, gave birth to the only means of
our freedom, Christ Jesus the Lord. Will you, will we say Yes to God,
conceive His Word, and keep in the world the mercy and love that Jesus
lived and died to bring to us? Do this holy work and the Lord will
bless you and keep you! The Lord will let his face shine upon you. .
.The Lord will look upon you kindly and give you peace!
____________________Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
29 December 2013
Does narrative rescue God from metaphysics?
There are
contemporary theologians and philosophers of religion who challenge the dominance of what they call "onto-theological thinking,"
that is, following Nietzsche and Heidegger, these folks argue that it
was a big mistake for the Church's earliest theologians to translate the
Biblical witness of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob into the Greek
language of substance metaphysics: "Yahweh" becomes "Being Itself."
The identification of Abraham's
God with Plato's One seems natural enough when you consider Exodus 3.14,
"I AM that I AM" (or any of the dozens of renditions). With a name
like "I AM," you are inviting metaphysical speculation on the nature of
existence and your place in the scheme of things. If God is not a being
like all the others in the world, and yet He somehow manages to exist .
. .how exactly are we supposed to understand what it means to exist but
not as an existing thing? Aquinas' answer: God is not a being; He is
Being. He doesn't exists; He is existence.
Now, we could interpret the last two sentences above in purely metaphysical terms. "God" and "Being" are two names we give to the persistence of existing. No bible necessary here. We could also interpret those same two sentences in a purely Biblical sense, using Exo 3.14 as our text and show that "I AM" is a religious and not a philosophical concept. But as Gilson argues, this sort of splitting your worldview up into separate parts in order to keep them compartmentalized is dishonest. So, an honest believer's religious, philosophical, theological, etc. worldviews need to be consistent with one another.
Aquinas, wanting to be consistent, uses the first part of his Summa to address the question of who and what God is. To keep this post within a reasonable word count, I will simply quote Brian Davies on Aquinas' notion of God: "God. . .is the beginning and end of all thing, the Creator of the world which depends on him for its existence. . .Aquinas also holds that God is alive, perfect, good, eternal, omnipresent, omnipotent, and omniscient. . ."(129).* Taking up the characteristics usually assigned to The One of Platonic metaphysics, Aquinas attributes them to God and then argues that though we can have some limited knowledge of God, we cannot know God perfectly this side of heaven.**
Skipping over a couple of centuries of development in philosophical theology, we arrive at what is usually called "the Problem of Evil." In the past this argument has been more or less used by religious skeptics and atheists to poke holes in theism. For some, it's THE argument against theism and moves them to quit religion entirely. The classical form of the argument goes something like this:
1. God is omnipresent, omnipotent, and omniscient.
2. Evil exists.
3. Therefore, one or more of the "omni" attributions in #1 must be false.
#3 here is usually taken to mean that God cannot be all-knowing, all-powerful, and everywhere present if evil exists. He could be a combination of any of the two but not all three.
This is an example of philosophy helping theology untangle a problem. However, couldn't we say that philosophy caused this problem in the first place? There would be no Problem of Evil if we had resisted the temptation to translate Yahweh into Being Itself. Yahweh is not presented in scripture as possessing the three-omni's of Plato's One. When Yahweh is addressed as "All-powerful Lord," He is being praised in emotive language and not assigned the philosophical label "omnipotent." Etc. for the other two-omni's.
Our Nietzschean and Heideggerian theologians/philosophers would have us abandon the God of Plato's metaphysics and simply stick with the Biblical God of Abraham, etc. This notion of "forgetting metaphysics" has a number of different names in the academy, but the most common is "narrative theology." Generally associated with the Yale Divinity School, narrative theologians are impatient with complex metaphysical problems and all the messy philosophical waste that seems to be secreted from the history of onto-theological discourse. Their goal is to rescue biblical revelation from the clutches of onto-theological-philosophical obfuscation and return it to the center of the Church's communal life. This strikes me as a important consideration for the development of a Catholic theology of preaching.
However, in theology more generally, how we go about separating out philosophy from narrative in the biblical witness is beyond me. We could, I suppose, focus only on metaphysical language (being, cause, essence, etc) and remove it from our theologizing about revelation. But then that leaves us unable to ask epistemological questions (i.e., how do we know?). We could just say that philosophy is really about wisdom and telling stories is the best way to disseminate and promote wisdom. I wouldn't disagree entirely with this, but we are still left with deciding what counts as wisdom and what doesn't. We also have the problem of interpreting and applying a story's wisdom to concrete situations. That's called hermeneutics. And it comes with a whole mule-load of philosophical considerations. . .and so on.
So, our theological enterprise is not doable without philosophy. We might disagree about which philosophical approach to take, but philosophy as a way of thinking and talking about problems in human discourse is a non-negotiable. It's here to stay. To paraphrase an old prof of mine: "Philosophy always seems to be its own undertaker!"
*"Aquinas on What God is Not," in Aquinas's Summa Theologiae: Critical Essays, ed. Brian Davies, Rowan and Littlefield, 2006, 129-144.
**It is this "divine hiddenness" that causes some sceptical philosophers and theologians to question the possibility of knowing anything at all about God. Some go so far as to argue that the obscurity of God--intended or not--is sufficient reason to withhold belief in His existence. The argument goes, if God loves me and wants me to be saved; and if believing in God is all-important to my eternal salvation; then revealing Himself to me would be an act of salvific love, while remaining hidden is an act of cruelty. I'm skipping over several crucial steps in the argument, of course, but you get the idea: divine hiddenness is an epistemological nightmare.
Now, we could interpret the last two sentences above in purely metaphysical terms. "God" and "Being" are two names we give to the persistence of existing. No bible necessary here. We could also interpret those same two sentences in a purely Biblical sense, using Exo 3.14 as our text and show that "I AM" is a religious and not a philosophical concept. But as Gilson argues, this sort of splitting your worldview up into separate parts in order to keep them compartmentalized is dishonest. So, an honest believer's religious, philosophical, theological, etc. worldviews need to be consistent with one another.
Aquinas, wanting to be consistent, uses the first part of his Summa to address the question of who and what God is. To keep this post within a reasonable word count, I will simply quote Brian Davies on Aquinas' notion of God: "God. . .is the beginning and end of all thing, the Creator of the world which depends on him for its existence. . .Aquinas also holds that God is alive, perfect, good, eternal, omnipresent, omnipotent, and omniscient. . ."(129).* Taking up the characteristics usually assigned to The One of Platonic metaphysics, Aquinas attributes them to God and then argues that though we can have some limited knowledge of God, we cannot know God perfectly this side of heaven.**
Skipping over a couple of centuries of development in philosophical theology, we arrive at what is usually called "the Problem of Evil." In the past this argument has been more or less used by religious skeptics and atheists to poke holes in theism. For some, it's THE argument against theism and moves them to quit religion entirely. The classical form of the argument goes something like this:
1. God is omnipresent, omnipotent, and omniscient.
2. Evil exists.
3. Therefore, one or more of the "omni" attributions in #1 must be false.
#3 here is usually taken to mean that God cannot be all-knowing, all-powerful, and everywhere present if evil exists. He could be a combination of any of the two but not all three.
There are hundreds of different reasonable responses to the Problem of
Evil. I'm keen on the Free Will Defense myself: evil is allowed by God
so that human freedom may be maximized; or since God wills that human
freedom be maximized, He allows evil, which inevitably results from the
abuse of human freedom. This is basically Aquinas' response, so we know
it's the correct one.
This is an example of philosophy helping theology untangle a problem. However, couldn't we say that philosophy caused this problem in the first place? There would be no Problem of Evil if we had resisted the temptation to translate Yahweh into Being Itself. Yahweh is not presented in scripture as possessing the three-omni's of Plato's One. When Yahweh is addressed as "All-powerful Lord," He is being praised in emotive language and not assigned the philosophical label "omnipotent." Etc. for the other two-omni's.
Our Nietzschean and Heideggerian theologians/philosophers would have us abandon the God of Plato's metaphysics and simply stick with the Biblical God of Abraham, etc. This notion of "forgetting metaphysics" has a number of different names in the academy, but the most common is "narrative theology." Generally associated with the Yale Divinity School, narrative theologians are impatient with complex metaphysical problems and all the messy philosophical waste that seems to be secreted from the history of onto-theological discourse. Their goal is to rescue biblical revelation from the clutches of onto-theological-philosophical obfuscation and return it to the center of the Church's communal life. This strikes me as a important consideration for the development of a Catholic theology of preaching.
However, in theology more generally, how we go about separating out philosophy from narrative in the biblical witness is beyond me. We could, I suppose, focus only on metaphysical language (being, cause, essence, etc) and remove it from our theologizing about revelation. But then that leaves us unable to ask epistemological questions (i.e., how do we know?). We could just say that philosophy is really about wisdom and telling stories is the best way to disseminate and promote wisdom. I wouldn't disagree entirely with this, but we are still left with deciding what counts as wisdom and what doesn't. We also have the problem of interpreting and applying a story's wisdom to concrete situations. That's called hermeneutics. And it comes with a whole mule-load of philosophical considerations. . .and so on.
So, our theological enterprise is not doable without philosophy. We might disagree about which philosophical approach to take, but philosophy as a way of thinking and talking about problems in human discourse is a non-negotiable. It's here to stay. To paraphrase an old prof of mine: "Philosophy always seems to be its own undertaker!"
*"Aquinas on What God is Not," in Aquinas's Summa Theologiae: Critical Essays, ed. Brian Davies, Rowan and Littlefield, 2006, 129-144.
**It is this "divine hiddenness" that causes some sceptical philosophers and theologians to question the possibility of knowing anything at all about God. Some go so far as to argue that the obscurity of God--intended or not--is sufficient reason to withhold belief in His existence. The argument goes, if God loves me and wants me to be saved; and if believing in God is all-important to my eternal salvation; then revealing Himself to me would be an act of salvific love, while remaining hidden is an act of cruelty. I'm skipping over several crucial steps in the argument, of course, but you get the idea: divine hiddenness is an epistemological nightmare.
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)