"A [preacher] who does not love art, poetry, music and nature can be dangerous. Blindness and deafness toward the beautiful are not incidental; they are necessarily reflected in his [preaching]." — BXVI
30 October 2014
Nothing less will see you complete. . .
30th Week OT (Th)
Fr. Philip Neri Powell, OP
Notre Dame Seminary, NOLA
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
Fr. Philip Neri Powell, OP
Notre Dame Seminary, NOLA
We
must continue on The Way – today, tomorrow, and the following day.
We will not abandon God's house, so, following along behind the Lord,
we must persevere. Hunted as he is by that fox, King Herod, Jesus
stands strong in his mission and ministry. Why
he is sent and what
he is sent to do IS who
he is, so there's no going back, no backing down, no giving up. If we
are to be faithful followers of the One sent, then we too must become
the why, the what, and the who of Christ's mission and ministry. And
we cannot accomplish this alone, nor can we accomplish this with weak
minds, frail hearts, and darkened souls. Paul writes to the
Ephesians, “Draw your strength from the Lord and from his mighty
power. Put on the armor of God so that you may be able to stand firm
against the tactics of the Devil.” Draw strength. Put on your
armor. Stand firm. And “words [will] be given [you] to open [your]
mouth, to make known with
boldness the mystery
of the Gospel.” Do you labor to make known the mystery of the
Gospel – with
boldness?
Paul
uses the adverb noun parrēsia
(παρρησίᾳ)* to describe the energy with which we are to make
known the mystery of the Gospel. Parrēsia
means plainly, openly, publicly, freely, confidently. In other words,
we are not to preach and teach the Gospel obscurely, privately,
reservedly, or hesitantly. The full truth, goodness, and beauty of
God's Self-revelation to His children in Christ Jesus is not a
precious secret to be kept locked away; it's not an occult system to
be parceled out in meager bits by experts; it's not a self-help
formula to be sold like detergent or beer. The full truth, goodness,
and beauty of God's Self-revelation to His children in Christ Jesus
is to be plainly, openly, freely – boldly – proclaimed as a
service to creation, as a servant's work to anyone and everyone who
will hear it. To take on this servant's work is to become the Gospel
in flesh and bone, surrendering your heart, mind, and body, and
becoming – for the greater glory of God! – a material vehicle of
the Good News. Therefore, draw strength; put on your armor; and stand
firm b/c your chosen work puts you in danger of being hunted. The
tactics of the Devil are at once bold and subtle; public and private.
Our escape from the hunt is found in fortitude, perseverance,
courage, and excellence.
When
told by the Pharisees that the fox, King Herod, is hunting him, Jesus
responds with defiance, saying, in essence, “Tell Herod to mind his
own business. I'm busy about my Father's work, and I'm not going
anywhere until I'm done.” Notice that our Lord's response
exemplifies the virtues we need to boldly proclaim the Gospel.
Fortitude
– his strength of purpose. Perseverance
– his determination in finishing the job. Courage
– against religious and secular opposition, he pushes on. And
excellence
– a nearly impossible job done to perfection. The boldness with
which we preach and teach the Good News marks us as followers of the
One sent to open wide the gates of heaven and welcome the sinner to
God's mercy through repentance. When we fail to preach and teach with
boldness, when we fail to proclaim the mystery of the Gospel, we
confess the triumph of the Devil's tactics in silencing us. So, Paul
admonishes us: “Put on the armor of God, that you may be able to
resist on the evil day and, having done everything, to hold your
ground.” Have we done everything? Have you done everything to
profess and announce boldly, confidently, publicly the freely offered
mercy of God to all sinners? Nothing less than becoming the who,
what, and why of the mission and ministry of Christ will see you
complete.
* I was reliably informed after Mass that this is a noun used adverbially. One of the many benefits of preaching at a seminary. . .
_____________________* I was reliably informed after Mass that this is a noun used adverbially. One of the many benefits of preaching at a seminary. . .
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
27 October 2014
Varnish & Red Paint
Mendicant Painterly Thanks goes out to M.R. for sending me some varnish and red paint from the New Artiste Wish List!
Let's pray that we don't both end up regretting this. :-)
______________________
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
26 October 2014
30th Sunday OT: audio file
Reaching Down for Higher Things: audio file for my homily on the 30th Sunday OT
_________________________
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
25 October 2014
Reaching Down for Higher Things
NB. Finally! I get to preach this 2008 Roman homily. I knew that keeping up with my homily writing while in Rome would come in handy one day. . .
NB 2. So. . .I'm sitting there in the presider's chair, listening to the readings. . .when it hits me that the reader had just said: "A reading from the first letter of St. Paul to the Thessalonians." I almost stopped her. . .I checked the missalette. Yup. She's right. I wrote this homily in 2008. I've read it dozen of times since then. . .tho never preached it. Today is the first time that I noticed that I used Corinthians instead of Thessalonians in the homily. No idea why.
NB 2. So. . .I'm sitting there in the presider's chair, listening to the readings. . .when it hits me that the reader had just said: "A reading from the first letter of St. Paul to the Thessalonians." I almost stopped her. . .I checked the missalette. Yup. She's right. I wrote this homily in 2008. I've read it dozen of times since then. . .tho never preached it. Today is the first time that I noticed that I used Corinthians instead of Thessalonians in the homily. No idea why.
30th Sunday OT
Fr. Philip Neri Powell, OP
St. Anthony of Padua/Our Lady of the Rosary, NOLA
Audio File
St.
Paul, ever the romantic(!), writing in his first letter to the
Corinthians, insists that “love is patient, love is kind. Love is not
jealous, is not pompous; it is not inflated; it is not rude; it does not
seek its own interest [. . .] but rather rejoices with the truth”(1 Cor
13). He goes on to write that love bears, believes, hopes and endures
all things; and finally, he declares, as if he has never grieved a
betrayal or lost his heart to passion: “Love never fails.” The
romantic whispers, “Yes!” The cynic scoffs, “Bull.” The pragmatist
asks, “Really? Never?” The Catholic exclaims, “Deo gratis! Thanks be to
God!” Who needs for love to never fail more than he for whom Love is
God? This is why Jesus teaches the Pharisees that the spiritual heart
of the Law is: “You shall love the Lord, your God, will all your heart,
with all your soul, and with all your mind [. . .] You shall your
neighbor as yourself.” Listen to Paul again, “Our Lord is patient, He
is kind. He is not jealous, is not pompous; He is not inflated; He is
not rude; He does not seek His own interest [. . .] but rather Our Lord
rejoices with the truth.” Though Paul is writing to the Corinthians to
show them how we must love one another—patiently, kindly, selflessly—we
cannot, cannot love at all except that Love Himself loves us first.
Therefore, with the Lord and because of the Lord, we love Him, one
another; and we rejoice with His truth.
Now,
that we must be commanded to love says everything that needs to be said
about the weaknesses of the human heart, soul, and mind. That we must
be commanded to love tells us that we do not eagerly enthrone love in
the center of our being, making all we do the children of charity. That
we must be commanded to love tells us that we do not love as a way of
giving thanks for our very existence, for the gift of being alive. That
we must be commanded to love tells us that we do not reason with the
grace of God’s wisdom, with the deliberative power granted to us as
creatures created in His divine image. That we must be commanded to
love tells us that we are not God but rather creatures imperfect without
God, longing for God, grieving our loss yet yearning for the peace and
truth of His Being-with-us.
Think
for a moment of the ways we have struggled in our past to find some
small portion of peace and truth. Moses returns from Mt. Sinai to find
his people giving themselves over to the idols of their former masters
in slavery. Paul admonishes the Corinthians for turning to “worldly
philosophies” for their much-needed wisdom. He lashes them for rutting
indiscriminately in the flesh, surrendering body and soul to disordered
passion and vice. Jesus teaches against the legalistic blindness of the
Pharisees; he calls them “white washed tombs,” beautifully, lawfully
clean on the outside but stuffed with rotted meat on the inside. In our
long past we have turned to idols, pagan philosophies, debauchery and
license, and taken an easy refuge in the dots and tittles of the law.
Each of these reach for the peace and truth we long for, but none grasp
the love we need.
Think
for a moment of the ways you yourself have struggled in your past and
struggle even now to find some small portion of peace and truth. Do you
look to the idols of power, wealth, possessions, or Self to find your
purpose? Do you scratch your itchy ears with the wisdom of the world?
With the profound systems of material science, the occult mysteries of
New Age gurus, the glittering gospels of prosperity and celebrity?
Perhaps you search for and hope to find some peace in your body, your
flesh and bones. Do you worship at Gold’s Gym, Kroger and Target,
Blockbuster, or CVS, searching for peace in a perfectly sculpted body, a
full belly, a house full of things, a visual distraction, or
over-the-counter cures for the nausea and headache of a life that will
not love God? Or, perhaps in this election season, you look to parties
and politicians to give you hope and security. Do you look to the
Democrats to give you the ease of a well-funded government entitlement?
Or perhaps you look to the Republicans to secure your place near the
top of the economic food-chain? Do you think Obama will give you hope?
Or that McCain will give you security? When we reach down for higher
things, we grasp the lowest of the low and in our disappointment we name
the Lowest the Highest, and then, in our pride, we pretend to be at
peace. To do otherwise is to confess that we are fools fooled by
foolish hearts, that we are stubborn mules needing the bridle and bit.
And
perhaps we are fools. Perhaps this is why Jesus finds it necessary to
command us to love God and one another. Why command what we would and
could do willingly? In Exodus our Lord must command that we not molest
the foreigners among us. That we must care for the women who have lost
their husbands and children who have no family. He must command us not
to extort money from the poor or strip them of their modest possessions
for our profit. We must be commanded not to kill one another, not to
steal, not to violate our solemn oaths, not to worship alien gods. Why
doesn’t it occur to us naturally to care for the weakest, the least
among us? To help those who have little or nothing? Why must we be
commanded not to destroy the gift of life, not to lie or extort, not to
surrender our souls to the demonic and the dead? We must be commanded
to love God, to hope in His promises, to trust in His providential care
because in our foolish hearts we believe that we are God and that we
have no other gods but ourselves.
Are
we fools? Probably not entirely. But we are often foolish, often
believing and behaving in ways that give lie to Paul’s declaration,
“Love never fails.” God never fails, but we often do. When we make the
creature the Creator, giving thanks and praise to the bounty of our own
wisdom, we reach down for the higher things and convince ourselves that
we have grasped truth. We do this when we believe that it is not only
sometimes necessary but also good to murder the innocent; when we
believe that it is right to murder the inconveniently expensive, those
whom the Nazis called “useless eaters,” the sick, the elderly, the
disabled. We reach down for higher truths when we create markets for
housing in order to exploit for profit the homelessness of the poor.
We are foolish when we raise impregnable borders around the gifts we
have been given , gifts given to us so that we might witness freely to
God’s abundance. We do foolish things because we believe we are God,
and so, we must be commanded by Love Himself to love. But surely this
is no hardship. Difficult, yes. But not impossible. With Love all
things are possible.
What
must we do? To love well we must first come to know and give thanks to
Love Himself. He loved us first, so He must be our First Love.
Second, we must hold as inviolable the truth that we cannot love Love
Himself if we fail to love one another. Third, love must be the first
filter through which we see, hear, think, feel, speak, and act. No
other philosophy or ideology comes before Love Himself. This mean
obeying (listening to and complying with) His commandments and doing now
all the things that Christ did then. Fourth, after placing God as our
first filter, we must surrender to Love’s providential care, meaning we
must sacrifice (make holy by giving over) our prideful need to control,
direct, order our lives according to the world’s priorities. Wealth and
power do not mark success. Celebrity does not mark prestige. “Having
everything my way” does not mark freedom. Last, we must grow in
holiness by becoming Christ—frequent attention to the sacraments,
private prayer and fasting, lectio divina,
strengthening our hearts with charitable works, sharpening our minds
with beauty and truth in art, music, poetry, and while being painfully,
painfully aware of how far we can fall from the perfection of Christ,
knowing that we are absolutely free to try again and again and again.
Though we often fail love, Love never fails us. Remember: who needs for love to never fail more than he for whom Love is God?____________________
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
Five Abstracts (II)
Here are five abstracts I recently finished. 16 x 20 canvas board. NB. all the usual caveats about my crappy little camera washing out the colors. . .
^ Lava me, Domine! RECYCLED
^ Ezekiel 37 (RECYCLED)
^ Across the Red Sea (RECYCLED)
^ Leaving Eden Again
^ Perfecting Graces
____________________
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
24 October 2014
WWJD?
29th Week OT(F)
Fr. Philip N. Powell, OP
Notre Dame Seminary, NOLA
Fr. Philip N. Powell, OP
Notre Dame Seminary, NOLA
There's
a Facebook meme that reads: “Remember—when someone asks, 'What
Would Jesus Do?' Freaking out and throwing tables is a viable
option.” The meme has a line drawing of Jesus. . .freaking out and
throwing tables. When we wonder whether or not anger is an acceptable
Christian response, we think of Jesus in the temple courtyard,
thrashing the moneychangers. What gospel scene do we imagine when we
wonder about the acceptability of feeling and showing frustration and
impatience? May I suggest this morning's gospel? Jesus accuses the
crowds of hypocrisy b/c they continue to hesitate in accepting the
truth right in front of their faces. They can read the signs of an
impending storm. And they can read the signs for a warm, sunny day.
So why can't they see that he's come to fulfill the Law and free them
all from sin? Just a few verses before today's reading, we read Jesus
saying, “I have come to set the earth on fire, and how I wish it
were already blazing!” Impatient? Frustrated? Well, what would
Jesus do? He'd set the world on fire.
Lest
you think Jesus is threatening an actual conflagration, let me
quickly point out what he says immediately after this, “There is a
baptism with which I must be baptized, and how great is my anguish
until it is accomplished!” Baptism here refers to his
sacrificial death on the cross, the sacrifice that must occur before
the world can set ablaze with the Holy Spirit. If his reference is a
little obscure, his feelings on the issue aren't. He's frustrated,
impatient. And the dumbstruck crowd milling around him isn't helping
matters much. Keep in mind: he's anxious to be about the business for
which he was sent—our salvation. So the reluctance of those who
listen to him to accept their own redemption must be extremely
aggravating. As understandable as his frustration might be, why does
he accuse these poor people of hypocrisy? When they see a cloud in
the west, they know it's going to rain, so they scramble to prepare
for a storm. They see the sign and act on it. Here he is—a living,
breathing sign of the Father's mercy—and most of them just stand
there gawking at him. A few want more evidence. Some even demand
miracles. Fortunately, there were no tables or moneychangers in the
crowd that day! And that Jesus left his whip with Mother Mary.
New
Orleans is populated by hurricane experts. We know how to interpret
the weather in the Gulf, but do we know how to interpret the present
time? We do, even if we sometimes forget that we do. Here's a
reminder. The present time is a godly gift. Call it a Saptio-temporal
Gift, the divine gift of space and time in which we always live and
thrive. As a gift, the present time—right now—is the only moment
we have to acknowledge our total dependence on God and give Him
thanks for giving us life and keeping us alive. Every second we are
alive affords us the opportunity to renew and reinforce our gratitude
to God; every second we're alive grants us the chance to receive His
mercy and grow in holiness; every second we're alive Christ dares us
to set this world on fire with his Good News. We can interpret the
present time b/c for us (as followers of Christ) the past, present,
and future all come together in one explosive moment of all-consuming
grace: the doors of heaven are slammed open, and we are set on fire
by the glory of God's love for us. One Lord, one faith, one baptism;
one God and Father of all, who is over all, and through all, and in
all. What would Jesus do? He would die so that we all might live.
_______________________
We have work to do
29th Week OT(F)
Fr. Philip N. Powell, OP
Notre dame Seminary, NOLA
The gov't will implant microchips in its citizens. And the computer that controls theses chips is called “The Beast.” The leader of ISIS will be killed and then rise again in three days to become the Anti-Christ. The Ebola virus epidemic was designed by the CIA and the DHS to bring about martial law. The Blessed Mother warns that there is a Great Chastisement coming to punish us for the errors of the recent Synod. Secular powers, controlled by a cabal of modernist Illuminati-Satanists, will systematically persecute the Church. Bishops, priests, deacons, entire religious orders and even a future pope serve these Satanists even now. These are just a few of the dire predictions about the future world of our world. I won’t even touch on the Protestant disaster scenarios I grew up with. Here’s the problem with these predictions: even if they prove to be true, so what? I mean, what does it matter? We have a job to do and entertaining end-of-the-world fantasies isn't in the contract. We know who Christ is, therefore, we know how to read the signs of his coming again.
Fr. Philip N. Powell, OP
Notre dame Seminary, NOLA
The gov't will implant microchips in its citizens. And the computer that controls theses chips is called “The Beast.” The leader of ISIS will be killed and then rise again in three days to become the Anti-Christ. The Ebola virus epidemic was designed by the CIA and the DHS to bring about martial law. The Blessed Mother warns that there is a Great Chastisement coming to punish us for the errors of the recent Synod. Secular powers, controlled by a cabal of modernist Illuminati-Satanists, will systematically persecute the Church. Bishops, priests, deacons, entire religious orders and even a future pope serve these Satanists even now. These are just a few of the dire predictions about the future world of our world. I won’t even touch on the Protestant disaster scenarios I grew up with. Here’s the problem with these predictions: even if they prove to be true, so what? I mean, what does it matter? We have a job to do and entertaining end-of-the-world fantasies isn't in the contract. We know who Christ is, therefore, we know how to read the signs of his coming again.
Jesus
knows that the hypocrites in the crowd know who he is and why he’s
preaching. He knows that they know that he’s fulfilled the
prophecies and that he is among them as the Christ. Though they can
easily read the signs in the sky and on the earth to predict the
weather, they pretend not to be able to read the signs of his coming
as the Messiah. Why? Likely b/c a correct interpretation of the signs
would require them to consider seriously the necessity of conversion,
the necessity of starting over in a New Life in Christ; meaning, they
would have to leave the old self behind and start fresh. That’s
frightening and arduous. In some bizarre sense a life of sin is
comfortable, familiar, even boring! The prospect of having such a
life revolutionized by acknowledging the arrival of the Messiah must
be terrifying. But why do Catholics spend their time and energy
worrying about Marian warnings, Illuminati plots, and sketchy
cardinals? There's work to be done. Hard work that isn't always
immediately rewarding and often quite dangerous.
Now,
if you think that I am implying here that we shouldn’t waste our
time with fantastic predictions of our apocalyptic demise, you’re
wrong. I’m not implying it at all. I’m saying it outright. Don’t
waste your time. The only prophecy that need concern a Catholic
is the prophecy of the arrival of the Messiah. He’s here. It’s
now time move on and make sure that everyone who meets us, hears us,
sees us, reads us, or even hears rumors about us knows that we have a
single mind, a single heart, one Word, one miracle in faith; that we
move and breath and grow and hope to die in one Spirit, preserved in
unity through the bond of peace. We must be absolutely sure that
everything we do and say fulfills with love the prophecy of Christ's
coming, his suffering, his death, his resurrection, and his coming
again. Does the world see the Body of Christ, the Church, coming in
glory to suffer in love, to serve in hope, to persevere in faith no
matter what comes?
When
we grind away our short hours here wringing our hands over strange
visions and crazy fortunes, we waste the gift of time for witnessing
to Love Who saves us and Who will bring us to Him forever. A
preoccupation with these visions opens us to all sorts of sins of
omission. What are we not doing for God’s people while decoding
biblical numerologies and arguing about the authenticity of another
Marian apparition. What gets left undone? Never does Jesus tell the
disciples that they will find themselves among the roasting goats in
Hell for failing to properly interpret and apply the message of one
of his mother’s visits. They will go to Hell, he tells them, for
failing to clothe the naked, for failing to visit the imprisoned, for
failing to feed the hungry, and for failing to welcome the stranger.
In other words, for failing to do the work Christ did, we fail as his
students and ambassadors, and we reject his grace. Goat, let me
introduce you to Fire. Goat, fire. Fire, goat.
We
have one Lord, one faith, one baptism and we have one witness: to
bear with one another through love so that the world is astonished by
our generosity and comes to Christ b/c our joy in his grace is
irresistibly contagious! We must prove that being a prisoner for the
Lord is the freest anyone can ever be.
_______________________Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
21 October 2014
If the Church is a Field Hospital. . .
1. A severely wounded solider is brought to the Field Hospital. The doctor
pokes his injuries with a stick and declares, "These wounds are
self-inflicted. You can't be admitted to this hospital until you are
completely healed."
2. Another severely wounded solider is brought to the Field Hospital. The
doctor begins life-saving treatment. The solider blurts out, "STOP! I
don't want to be healed! I want to be affirmed in my woundedness. Just
accept my injuries and welcome me as I am!"
3. Yet another solider is rushed to the Field Hospital. The doctor and the soldier agree that he is OK in his woundedness and let him stay in the hospital just as he is. . .wounds and all.
4. One last wounded soldier is carried into the Field Hospital. The doctor immediately begins treating his wounds. The solider says, "Thanks, doc. I can't heal up w/o your help."
______________________Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
19 October 2014
He is the LORD and there is no other
29th
Sunday OT
Fr.
Philip Neri Powell, OP
Our
Lady of the Rosary, NOLA
The
Pharisees show Jesus a Roman coin and ask whether or not they should
pay Caesar’s taxes. Matthew tells us that “knowing their malice,
Jesus said, ‘Why are you testing me, you hypocrites?... ‘Whose
image is this and whose inscription?’ They replied, ‘Caesar's.’
At that he said to them, ‘Then repay to Caesar what belongs to
Caesar and to God what belongs to God.’" Much has been made of
this infamous distinction between what is God’s and what is
Caesar’s. And even more could be made of it during this tense
political season. Ultimately, the distinction is meaningless because
everything belongs to God, including Caesar himself. I won't belabor
the point. The more interesting moment in this story is the moment
Jesus calls the Pharisees out for questioning him, or more precisely,
for “testing” him. According to Jesus, the Pharisees test him out
of a malicious hypocrisy; that is, a hateful insincerity, a spiteful
duplicity. Their apparently sincere question about paying taxes is
really a contrived event to catch him up, a staged incident,
choreographed and scripted to force Jesus into either treason against
Rome or blasphemy against God. Jesus skillfully dodges the trap with
an ultimately meaningless answer, but he manages to teach them and us
a truth nonetheless: “I am not who you want me to be. . .”
Let’s
get down to the question: who do you want Jesus to be? Father,
Mother, Santa Claus, mischievous elf, mythical Ego, Jungian
archetype, Ground of Being? Spiritual direction often starts with a
question about one’s image of God. Our prayer life tells us volumes
about how we understand who Jesus is for us. In desperate times, an
image of God emerges. Suffering carves out of us a hard figure of
God. When we reach beyond ourselves, beyond the possibilities of easy
helps and cheap fixes, we usually reach out toward heaven and call on
our God for His care, His rescue. And this is exactly what we ought
to do. There is nothing so humbling and spiritually purifying as a
moment of desperation, a flash of weakness, or damaging stupidity
that drives us to God’s comfort. But we must be careful: “Why are
you testing me, you hypocrites?” Our God is not our student, every
ready to be questioned, every ready to be tested.
Obviously,
like most politicians probing an opponents weaknesses, the Pharisees
are trying to trip Jesus up by asking him the “are you still
beating your wife?” sort of question. No answer is good, any answer
will be vacuous in the end. The point of the exchange is not to find
the truth but to expose a hated enemy as worthy of one’s hatred.
Jesus calls this attempt malicious and hypocritical. Malicious
because their intent is evil and hypocritical because they know that
they are not asking a real question but setting a trap. Their
insincerity is poisonous. But only to themselves. Who do the
Pharisees need Jesus to be? Or perhaps the best question: who do they
hope he turns out to be? Given their institutional investments in
riches and political commitments to power, no doubt the Pharisees
hope he turns out to be little more than some redneck preacher from
the podunk town of Nazareth. Most of those guys didn't live long
enough to know the truth of Christ's mission and ministry.
We've
heard the truth, so let's test ourselves: given your institutional
investments in riches and political commitments to power, who do you
hope Jesus turns out to be? Jesus says to give to Caesar what is his
and give to God what belongs to Him. Of course, this means that we
give all things to God in the end b/c all that belongs to Caesar
really belongs to God. For a while, while we walk around on the dirt,
we give Caesar his due—his taxes, our obedience to his laws within
our duties to God, our civic participation. But in giving Caesar his
due now our hearts must always be inclined to a longing and a goal
well beyond Caesar’s temporary crown; focused fiercely, permanently
on the Crown of Heaven. The Pharisees hope to use this apparently
split-allegiance to force Jesus into a political-religious quagmire.
They need for Jesus to be a madman or a traitor or a blasphemer, so
they test him in their malicious hypocrisy, rigging the test to give
them the result they hope for; and in getting the hoped-for answer,
relieving them of any duty to preach his message, teach his word, or
offer him their obedience as the Messiah promised by the prophets.
Rather
than giving them what they hope for, Jesus says, in essence, “I am
not who you want me to be.” Jesus is not a traitor or a blasphemer.
Nor is he a revolutionary or an institutional cog. He is not a
preacher of flaccid tolerance nor a fire-breathing demagogue. He is
neither a temple priest nor an institutional preacher. He is neither
a Democrat nor a Republican. He is the Prince of Peace who comes with
a death-dealing sword to deal death to our sin. He is the Lamb of God
who comes with a scourge to beat the unfaithful for their hypocrisy
and out of his temple. He is the Final Judge who died for us, making
us clean before the Father’s throne. He is the Lion of David’s
House who gently shepherds, protects, and provides. He tells Isaiah:
“I am the LORD and there is no other, there is no God besides me.
It is I who arm you, though you know me not, so that toward the
rising and the setting of the sun people may know that there is none
besides me. I am the LORD, there is no other.”
And
no other is the LORD! Not the state, not a political party, not an
institution, not a person or an idea or a theory. Nothing made
can save us. Nothing passing can give us eternal life. If it can die,
it cannot give eternal life. If it can change, it cannot impart
perfection. If it can fail, it cannot gift us with goodness. That we
want a man, a party, a system, or an idea to save us, to give us
life, to grant us goodness is a sin as old as Eve’s yes to the
serpent’s gift. Like the maliciously hypocritical Pharisees, don’t
we often find ourselves testing Jesus to see who he will be for us
today? Just poking him a bit to see if he will budge on a favorite
issue or yield a bit on a favorite sin? We've seen and heard quite a
lot of this week coming out of the Synod on the Family in Rome. One
cardinal wanted to test the waters and published a report on the
bishops' discussions to that point. The report contained language
about divorced and remarried Catholics, co-habitating couples, and
same-sex unions that directly contradicts the Church's ancient
biblical understanding of marriage. Apparently, the good cardinal
looks at Jesus and sees a therapist, or perhaps a man who really
didn't mean it when he quoted Genesis, “. . .a
man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and
the two will become one flesh.” Fortunately, a majority of the
bishops called the cardinal to task and the report was rewritten to
reflect the truth of the faith. The temptation to remake our Lord in
our own image and likeness is overwhelming; however, we do well not to worry him with our tests. He is the Lord, not our student.
Jesus
fails the Pharisees' test. Turns out that he is not who they hope he
is. He is not the traitor, the blasphemer, the arch-heretic they had
hoped for. Neither is he a cuddly affirming therapist, nor the
fiery-eyed God of Righteous Vengeance Come to Smite Our Enemies, nor
the sagacious prophet with a stoical temper. He is the Judge, the
Lamb, the Prince, the Child, the King, the Seed, the Vine, the Word,
the Spirit. He is the LORD. And there is no other and no other is the
LORD.
____________________________
Synod: desolations, tensions, and temptations
A provisional translation of the Holy Father's closing address to the Synod bishops.
The Holy Father mentioned a few moments of "desolation, of tensions and temptations". . .
- One, a temptation to hostile
inflexibility, that is, wanting to close oneself within the written
word, (the letter) and not allowing oneself to be surprised by God, by
the God of surprises, (the spirit); within the law, within the certitude
of what we know and not of what we still need to learn and to achieve.
From the time of Christ, it is the temptation of the zealous, of the
scrupulous, of the solicitous and of the so-called – today –
“traditionalists” and also of the intellectuals.
- The temptation to a destructive tendency to goodness [it.
buonismo], that in the name of a deceptive mercy binds the wounds
without first curing them and treating them; that treats the symptoms
and not the causes and the roots. It is the temptation of the
“do-gooders,” of the fearful, and also of the so-called “progressives
and liberals.”
- The temptation to transform stones into bread to break the long,
heavy, and painful fast (cf. Lk 4:1-4); and also to transform the bread
into a stone and cast it against the sinners, the weak, and the sick (cf
Jn 8:7), that is, to transform it into unbearable burdens (Lk 11:46).
- The temptation to come down off the Cross, to please the people,
and not stay there, in order to fulfil the will of the Father; to bow
down to a worldly spirit instead of purifying it and bending it to the
Spirit of God.
- The temptation to neglect the “depositum fidei” [the
deposit of faith], not thinking of themselves as guardians but as owners
or masters [of it]; or, on the other hand, the temptation to neglect
reality, making use of meticulous language and a language of smoothing
to say so many things and to say nothing! They call them “byzantinisms,”
I think, these things…
That's some masterful Jesuitical tight-rope walking, folks! Obviously, the Holy Father was paying careful attention to the synod discussions.
_________________________Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
16 October 2014
Bishops Revolt!
Looks like the Synod on the Family is back in the hands of the participant-bishops rather than the appointed leadership.
Monday's relatio was roundly denounced as an inaccurate summary of the bishops' discussion, but b/c the actual language-group reports were not made public. . .there was no way for anyone to check.
Today, the bishops rose up and demanded that the group summaries be made public. Pope Francis and the synod chair relented and agreed to have them made available.
Fr. Z. has an English translation of the Italian-language article, along with his usual on-point commentary. He also provides links to the summaries on the Vatican website.
Even a cursory scan of the summaries will prove that the relatio was an agenda pushing one-sided mess.
I'm not ready to believe that this whole thing was an outright manipulation; however, given my long experience with self-anointed prophets and revolutionaries in the Church and religious life. . .it wouldn't surprise me in the least to learn that it was.
Keep praying, folks!
________________________Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
15 October 2014
Take No Other Path
St
Teresa of Jesus
Fr.
Philip Neri Powell, OP
Sisters
of Mt Carmel, NOLA
Our
Lord is unrelenting in his condemnation of hypocrisy, particularly
the hypocrisy of those who wield religious authority. He says to the
Pharisees, “Woe to you! You are like unseen graves over which
people unknowingly walk.” Not only does he accuse his opponents of
being dead and rotting in the ground, but he also accuses them of
leading their unwitting followers into uncleanliness, impurity. Thus
the hypocrisy of each Pharisee is both a personal and a public
failure. When spiritual leaders fall, those who follow them fall as
well. Jesus concludes his indictment of the Pharisees and scribes
with a pointed accusation, “You impose on people burdens hard to
carry, but you yourselves do not lift one finger to touch them.”
Here lies the kernel of their hypocrisy: though they follow the Law
to the letter, they do so only for the benefits that come with being
seen doing so. They do not intend to see justice done nor do they
love God; their only purpose is to lift themselves up and bask in the
admiration of their followers. Therefore, Jesus says to them three
times, “Woe to you. . .”
How
do we avoid the temptations of hypocrisy? Paul writes to the
Galatians, “If you are guided by the Spirit, you are not under the
law. . .If we live in the Spirit, let us also follow the Spirit.”
Paul is not giving us permission to live lawless lives, wildly
following every impulse, every appetite. He is challenging us to do
something far more difficult than living the letter of the Law.
Rather than scrupulously obeying every jot and tittle of the rules,
we are called upon to fulfill the Law; that is, we are freed by
Christ to live out the purpose of the Law, the underlying freedom
that the rules guide. For example, you can be meticulous in driving
the posted speed limit and still believe that the other drivers
deserve to be run off the road. You can come to Mass daily and still
seek vengeance on your neighbor. You vow yourself to living a life of
charity and still disparage your brothers and sisters. Despite a
perfect driving record or a lifetime of perfect Mass attendance, you
can still harbor hatred, anger, selfishness, and rivalry. Following
the rules is no guarantee of a pure heart. But a pure heart makes the
rules unnecessary b/c such a heart is ruled by none but the name of
Jesus.
St.
Teresa of Avila considers the power and purity of the Holy Name: “.
. .it seems that no other name fell from [St. Paul's] lips than that
of Jesus, because the name of Jesus was fixed and embedded in his
heart. Once I had come to understand this truth, I carefully
considered the lives of some of the saints, the great contemplatives,
and found that they took no other path. . .A person must walk along
this path in freedom, placing himself in God’s hands. If God should
desire to raise us to the position of one who is an intimate and
shares His secrets, we ought to accept this gladly.”* Walking the
Way with Jesus, his name the name of freedom, and placing ourselves
with him into the Father's hands – this is the perfected way of
peace, the complete path to integrity and the death of personal
hypocrisy. Teresa names a few of the great contemplatives of the
Church as her examples: Francis, Anthony of Padua, Bernard, and
Catherine of Siena. All men and women of Christ who set aside the
need for power and control, the need to be right and never
contradicted, the need to be seen being holy by others. Their anchor
in the unmooring sin of this world: the name of Jesus, contemplated
as the only path to peace.
Christ
came to fulfill the Law. As his Body, the Church, we are vowed to
preach his Word. So, we share the fruits of that Spirit. Love, joy,
peace, patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, gentleness, and
self-control. If we will lead in the Spirit, we must first follow the
Spirit, and that, sisters, is exactly what we have given our lives to
do. Follow the Spirit first; then, lead with the Spirit in Jesus'
holy name.
*from The Office of Readings
_____________________
14 October 2014
Synod Freak Out!!!
Apparently, without the approval of the Pope or the involvement of the Holy Spirit, an interim report from the Synod on the Family radically altered unchangeable Church teaching on the disordered nature of same-sex attraction and SSA sexual relationships.
Who knew that an interim report from some of the bishops at a half-finished Synod could wield such authority!
Well, it doesn't. Wield any authority, that is. Despite what the anti-Catholic bigots of the MSM tell you.
The freak-out over this toothless report among otherwise faithful Catholics has been. . .epic.
What's most revealing is the level of distrust among the faithful in the Church's leadership. Given the way the implementation of VC2 was hijacked and abused, it's little wonder that we Catholics are skittish about councils, synods, and other ecclesial bureaucratic gatherings.
There's also a palpable sense among the faithful that there's a nefarious movement among some of the bishops at the Synod to influence the Holy Father toward changing unchangeable doctrine.
In answer to this suspicion, I give you Fr. Robert Barron: "One of the great mysteries enshrined in the ecclesiology of the Catholic
Church is that Christ speaks through the rather messy and unpredictable
process of ecclesiastical argument. The Holy Spirit guides the process
of course, but he doesn’t undermine or circumvent it. It is precisely in
the long, laborious sifting of ideas across time and through
disciplined conversation that the truth that God wants to communicate
gradually emerges. If you want evidence of this, simply look at the
accounts of the deliberations of the major councils of the Church,
beginning with the so-called Council of Jerusalem in the first century
right through to the Second Vatican Council of the twentieth century. In
every such gathering, argument was front and center, and consensus
evolved only after lengthy and often acrimonious debate among the
interested parties. Read John Henry Newman’s colorful history of the Council of Nicaea
in the fourth century, and you’ll find stories of riots in the streets
and the mutually pulling of beards among the disputants. Or pick up Yves
Congar’s very entertaining diary of his years at Vatican II,
and you’ll learn of his own withering critiques of the interventions of
prominent Cardinals and rival theologians. Or peruse John O’Malley’s history of the Council of Trent,
and you’ll see that early draft statements on the key doctrines of
original sin and justification were presented, debated, and
dismissed—long before final versions were approved."
We are in the Age of Twitter/Facebook/Texting. . .so we are seeing every morsel of fat and gristle that goes into the Synod's sausage making.
The trick is to wait for the final document (ca. 2017) and pray for the Holy Spirit to do His mighty work!
__________________Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)