6th Sunday of Easter
Fr. Philip Neri Powell, OP
St. Dominic Church, NOLA
St. Dominic Church, NOLA
Maybe
it's just me, but I get nervous when Jesus starts making promises. Of
course, most of the time he's promising Good Things. Like forgiveness
of sin and eternal life. But on occasion he promises things that
cause me give him a squinty-eyed glare. Things like persecution,
torture, and death. Then there are the promises that seem – I dunno
– odd. Maybe. . .unclear. Like the promise he makes this morning:
“The Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my
name, will teach you everything and remind you of all that I told
you.” This promise seems straightforward enough, but what does it
mean exactly? I mean, he'll send the Holy Spirit to teach us and
remind us. OK. But how will the Holy Spirit teach us and remind us?
Do we each get a tutorial with the Holy Spirit when we need to be
taught and reminded? Is there a class somewhere? Or a maybe a C-SPAN
call-in show where we can ask the Holy Spirit questions? No, nothing
so complicated as all that. Jesus promises, “Whoever loves me will
keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him
and make our dwelling with him.”
What
Jesus is telling us here is how the Holy Spirit will teach and remind
us. It's rather straightforward process: 1) love Christ the Son and
keep his word; 2) the Father loves those who love Christ and keep his
word; 3) the Father comes to dwell with those whom He loves; 4)
Christ the Son comes to dwell with those whom the Father loves; and
5) where the Father and Christ the Son dwell, so too dwells the Holy
Spirit! So, the Holy Spirit teaches and reminds those who love Christ
and keep his word. As I said, this is a straightforward process;
however, we might wonder why we need the on-going presence of the
Holy Spirit. After all, we have Scripture and Tradition, why do we
need the ever-present Spirit to teach us and remind us? Scripture and
Tradition are invaluable history, priceless records of how our
ancestor's in faith lived out God's Self-revelation. However, neither
Scripture nor Tradition can address every moral decision each of us
must make on a daily basis. We need a way to access the wisdom of God
when we are confronted by those difficult situations that the
inspired authors of Scripture and Tradition could never imagine. We
need a mechanism that allows us to participate in Christ's living
love and word so that his wisdom can guide our moral choices toward
holiness. We call this mechanism: conscience.
Many
of our centuries-old Christian concepts have been beaten and abused
in the last 50 years or so. None more so that the nature and purpose
of moral conscience. For example, every Disney movie produced in the
last 30 yrs pushes the notion that any moral difficulty is solved by
“just following your heart.” For decades, faithful Catholics have
been told by bishops, priests, religious, and theologians that
conscience simply means “doing whatever you want,” so long as you
claim you're doing it in “good conscience.” Conscience has come
to means something like “the inalienable right to invent my own
invincible truth.” To put it bluntly: this
is the Devil's definition of conscience.
The Church teaches us that “moral conscience. . .enjoins [us]. .
.to do good and to avoid evil” (CCC 1777). Good and evil here
describe objectively knowable standards of behavior not just
subjective beliefs or wishes. Conscience does not invent the truth;
it discovers the truth and urges us to do what is right.
“[Conscience]. . .bears witness to the authority of truth in
reference to the supreme Good to which the human person is drawn.
When he listens to his conscience, the prudent man can hear God
speaking”(CCC 1777). The prudent person knows
and
loves the teaching
and reminding presence of the Holy Spirit.
Blessed
John Cardinal Newman writes: “Conscience is the aboriginal Vicar of
Christ.” While Pope Francis is the current Vicar of Christ on
Earth, your conscience is the primordial vicar, the first
representative of Christ appointed to you by your Creator at your
creation. This means that we are all gifted with the divinely
assisted ability and moral duty to seek out and obey the truth. Not
to invent the truth as we wish it to be. Not to claim authority over
the truth b/c we find the truth unpleasant or inconvenient. But to
uncover the truth, and use it to do the good. To accomplish this
task, your conscience must be well-formed in right reason; grounded
in the moral law revealed in Scripture and in nature; and docile to
the legitimate authority of the Church to interpret both Scripture
and Tradition. Our “aboriginal vicar” is first, but it is not
last, and without the proper formation, it cannot be final. Christ
comes to live with those who love him and keep his word. And with him
comes the Holy Spirit. . .to teach us, to remind us, to strengthen
and confirm us in the faith. Our Lord promises us both great rewards
and difficult futures. But with the Holy Spirit dwelling in us and
among us, nothing merely difficult or troublesome or even terrifying
can move us from our Father's love and His promise of mercy.
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
I listened to this homily without having read it first, and I've begun to listen with the ears of my parish, so my comments may have nothing to do with the parishioners at St. D's.
ReplyDeleteAfter you got through your preliminaries, I thought this was going to be a teaching-homily, so I did listen with certain expectations. It turned into more of a reflective-homily. I'm not sure which was your purpose. I think you put a lot of big ideas out there, but didn't follow through with as much practical, easy-to-follow, information as I personally would have liked. Example of thoughts that went through my head: conscience isn't "follow your heart", well why not? What is wrong with that? OK, it's the devils definition, it's subjective not objective (what does THAT mean!) - tell me, explain to me plainly, why my heart shouldn't be followed. How do I form my conscience, the conscience of my children? You started to delve into that in the final paragraph, but not in a way which would mean much to the average parishioner (here). At the end, I thought: well, that was nice. But there was nothing in there that challenged me in a meaningful way to make a change or to even really wonder if I should change. There was information, sure, but it was all too broad. Maybe it was too much information and you could do nothing but be broad.
When you concluded, I had been listening with my eyes closed, and I was waiting for more. I had to open my eyes to be sure it was still streaming. It was a nice reflection, but I wanted more practical stuff - something the average person in the pew could take out with them and apply right then! This homily was at the same time, too elevated and not elevated enough. Too broad in scope to be practical, but not inspiring enough to invite people to want more.
You've basically nailed the fundamental problem with catechetical homilies...unless you can go on for awhile, there's not much that can be done beyond teaching a basic point. Add to that my gimpy knees and the desire not to stand too long and. . .voila!. . .
DeleteAs always, thanks for the feedback.
At my parish you would be encouraged to take some pain medicine and go on and on, giving a Methodist 3-point sermon! And THIRDLY... (interior groaning).
ReplyDeleteHA! I try to keep mine under 12mins.
DeleteGive your homily from the presidential chair, seated. A la St. Augustine. I used to do it every now and then just to see the looks on their faces.
ReplyDelete