Taste the pie

12^th Week OT (W)

Fr. Philip Neri Powell OP

St. Albert the Great, Irving

My maternal grandmother, Milly, made the best chocolate pie in the Mississippi Delta. Maybe in the whole state. Let's say all attempts by aunts, cousins, and second-cousins to duplicate her prize pie fail miserably. There's a written recipe. But it wasn't written by Milly. No one knew who composed the recipe, but it is obviously wrong. Over time, lots of sweet tea, and wasted ingredients, the aunts, cousins, and second-cousins compose a recipe that even the oldest members of the family would agree is authentic. Finally! We have the Real Thing captured on paper never to be altered. Mama Milly's Famous Chocolate Pie had reached it culinary perfection. And no pie could rightly be called Mama Milly's Famous Chocolate Pie unless it tasted like it came from her kitchen. The pies her generation of aunts made were fed to the next generation. That generation fed their pies to the next. And so on. We know a pie is the real deal b/c we have family members who remember. When a fake Milly pie makes an appearance, we know it immediately. Even if it tastes better; it's not a Milly pie. And the pie maker is false. We know the baker by his/her pies. Beware false bakers!

Jesus tells us to beware false prophets. Since false prophets rarely – if ever – advertise their duplicity, how do we know they are false? By tasting their pies. Or, as Jesus puts it, by judging their fruits. Good trees produce good fruit. Bad trees bad. So, is the prophet's fruit good or bad? This could be asking whether or not his/her prophecies are fulfilled. Does the prophet prophesy accurately? Or, we could be asking whether or not the prophet prophesies in a way that brings about unity, peace, hope, and holy guidance. Bad fruit brings about: division, turmoil, despair, panic – all leading to a loss of faith. Our history as a Church is jammed packed with false prophets, bellowing about one impending disaster or another. What they all have in common is a lack of trust in God's providence for his Church and a spiritually unhealthy fascination with when All This comes to an end. God sends prophets our way for just one reason: to tell us we have strayed and need to get back on track. He's in control. His plan has always, is now, and will always win out. Nothing changes that. Not war, natural disaster, dumb politicians, or corrupt Church leaders. If you're paying attention to your growth in holiness then you know we are off course. You know we are barreling toward the last guardrail and the brakes don't work. That's been true since three seconds after Christ ascended into heaven. And this is why God wills that through our baptism into the life, death, and resurrection of Christ Jesus we are all made prophets. Priests, prophets, and kings. What David and Elijah and John the Baptist and Christ Himself were by birth, we are made by water and the Spirit. Our great challenge is to be authentic prophets for the God's call to repentance from sin. So, if you want to make Mama Milly's Famous Chocolate Pie, you'll need real chocolate, heavy cream, lots of real sugar and butter, and a tub of lard for the crust. Try it with skim milk, Stevia, and Crisco, and you'll wear the shame of being a false baker. Real bakers, like real prophets, only use real ingredients. And they only produce good fruit.

Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->

Pretty but poisonous

12^th Week OT (T)

Fr. Philip Neri Powell OP

St. Albert the Great, Irving

It doesn't really matter what religion you follow as long as you are a good person. I'm spiritual but not religious b/c organized religion is too limiting. There is only one mountain but many paths to the top. Besides, in the end, everyone goes to heaven. So, who cares what faith you follow? OK. Jesus says, “How narrow the gate and constricted the road that leads to life. And those who find it are few.” As good Catholics, we know that universalism and religious indifferentism are heresies. Long condemned heresies that pop up regularly like mushrooms on a cow patty – pretty but poisonous. That these dangerous bits of bumper sticker theology still appear is obvious. But why do they continue to plague us? What is it about the human person that needs to believe them? Part of it is pride – making myself into my own god. If I'm my own god, then I get to write my own scripture and invent my own theology. Another part of it has to do a failure to understand the nature of truth. Two contradictory statements claiming to be true cannot both be true. Jesus says that his is the only name given under heaven for the salvation of mankind. If we believe this to be true, we cannot at the same time hold that the name of some other god is also salvific. Another part of the motivation for heresies like indifferentism and universalism is the laudable desire not to cause offense. It's just not polite to tell people they're going to hell b/c they don't follow Christ. No socially well-adjusted person wants to defend that claim at the Sunday barbecue! But I think the deeper problem is that we've made religious belief into an intensely private, intensely emotive, highly personalized way of being right about something. When it comes to religious belief, you cannot tell me I'm wrong; therefore, I am always right. Politics used to be like that. No longer. Everything personal is political nowadays. All we have left to always be right about is religion. But as Christians, as Catholics, we aren't allowed to fall back quietly on the motto the “Your truth, my truth” nonsense and relax. Our faith is rational; that is, it is explicable, defensible, demonstrably true, and comprehensive. Our faith isn't a boutique filled with carefully curated, handcrafted treasures designed to please and delight. It's a total worldview. An all-encompassing mindset that informs and guides every thought, word, and deed. It's The Way to think about, talk to, and walk back towards God. Does our faith provide us with knowledge of every truth? No. Nothing in the Tradition tells us which interpretation of quantum physics is the right one. Nothing in revelation or Church teaching tells us whether Whitman or Dickinson is the better poet. Tradition, revelation, Church teaching are all bent toward helping us to respond to God's salvific love and mercy. So, what we know about that response is that it must come through Christ. It must come freely. It reveals our trust in God through our words and our deeds. And on the Last Day, what gets us through that narrow gate is a face shining like a mirror, reflecting Christ's own face back to him. Not the Buddha's face. Or Mohammad's. Or Vishnu's. Christ's. His is the only name and the only face that saves.     

Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->

On not stabbing strangers

11^th Week OT (M)

Fr. Philip Neri Powell OP

St. Albert the Great, Irving

Jesus is doing one of the thing he does best – teaching us how to think and act beyond the rules and regs. Think about it: the everyday rules we're used to following all have some principled foundation. They are all founded on a deeper, broader idea of what is right and wrong to do. Ideally, if we follow the rules, we're enacting the deeper principle. But sometimes we get trapped in following the rules just to follow them; we behave in the prescribed way w/o knowing the why of the rule or custom. E.g., when we meet a stranger, we shake hands. It's almost automatic. This custom started in medieval Europe as a way of showing the other guy that you aren't holding a knife. Apparently, it's uncouth to stab someone on meeting them for the first time! Now, let's say you shook the stranger's hand and then stabbed him with your left hand. When others react angrily, you don't say, “Well, I shook his hand! I followed the rules.” Yes, you did. You followed the hand-shaking rule. But you missed the deeper principle the rule is meant to enact: trust is vital when strangers meet. Jesus is trying to teach us that the Law, while necessary, is fulfilled in the law of love.

St. Jerome sums it up nicely: “[B]y doing away [with] all retaliation, our Lord cuts off the beginnings of sin. So the Law corrects faults, the Gospel removes their occasions.” What are the “beginnings of sin”? Anger, a need for revenge, feelings of betrayal. The guy you stabbed is angry, so he stabs you back. That's an eye for an eye. No more, no less. Jesus says that stabbing you to avenge his hurt is wrong. The better way is for him to forgive you your sin. Why is this better? B/c the whole point being-here right now is to get to heaven. By stabbing you with vengeance in his heart, he violates the law of love and threatens his place at the Wedding Feast. All for a temporary sense of satisfaction. “Eye for an eye” corrects your fault. Bet you don't surprise-stab anyone again! But the law of love short circuits his impulse to retaliate, thus saving his immortal soul from damage. Deepest in the Law is the law of love – always and everywhere will the best for others. Yes, follow the rules. But understand that the rules are there to enact that which is surest to get us back to God: love God, love self, love neighbor.   

Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->

Legal ain't moral

St. Anthony of Padua

Fr. Philip Neri Powell OP

St. Albert the Great, Irving

Slavery was legal in the US for decades. Abortion is still legal in many states. Same-sex “marriage” is legal. So is divorce/remarriage, fornication, and child abandonment. That a moral act is legal does not make it righteous. And perfectly legal acts cannot guarantee righteousness simply b/c they are legal. This implies that there is something greater than the law to follow if righteousness is our goal. Jesus says that our righteousness must surpass the righteousness of the Pharisees and scribes. NB. he doesn't say that the scribes and the Pharisees are unrighteous. They are. According to their own reckoning of the Law. They follow the Law he came to fulfill. What they are missing – potentially – is the internal dispositions that give the Law its eternal effect. That is, the Law serves as an exterior sign that they are committed to God w/o touching who they actually are internally. We might defend this view of the Law by saying something like “well, better to follow the Law hypocritically than not at all!” But this approach can lead to self-righteousness and judgmentalism – the enduring sin of the scribes and Pharisees. Or maybe we could approach the problem by saying “fake it 'til you make it.” Follow the Law externally until you can follow it internally. Obey the 10 Commandments and eventually you'll come love God and neighbor. After all, virtues take time and practice to thrive. That's better but still not good enough b/c death stalks us all and our time to practice may end sooner than we think. Jesus tells his disciples to love first and obedience results. Love first and forgiveness and mercy and everything else we need to grow in righteousness results. The details of the Law “shake out” as we perfect the virtue of willing the Good of the Other. Love of God is perfected by loving His creatures. The more we love God and neighbor, the more we resemble those we love. And the less likely we are to treat Him and his creatures as inconvenient obstacles to getting our way. If pride is the original sin of believing and behaving as if we can become God w/o God, then charity is the original virtue of believing and behaving as if we can only become God with God. Loving God comes first. Then obedience and righteousness. Until obedience and righteousness are no longer necessary. 

Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->

Are we crazy?

10^th Sunday OT

Fr. Philip Neri Powell OP

St. Albert the Great, Irving

When I told my parents that I was changing my major from business to philosophy, my Mom said, “You're out of your mind.” She said the same thing when my application to join a religious order was rejected and I said I was determined to find one that would take me. I can't repeat here what she said when I told her I was going to China to teach English for a year. But it roughly translates as “you're out of your mind.” It's the business of children to make parents question their sanity. I aced that part of being a kid. More than once or twice. Now, Jesus' family is confronted by abundant evidence that he is nuts. He running around the country doing things that only a prophet can do: healing people, casting out demons, forgiving sins. He argues with respectable religious folks, claiming to have the authority to re-interpret scripture. He's got this gang of twelve hanging around with him, men who once had decent jobs and families. And occasionally he runs off into the desert to be alone with God. Add all these to the fact that everywhere he goes a mob follows along, clamoring for his attention. We're part of that mob. So, how crazy do you have to be to follow a crazy man? What promises does he make to induce our obedience?

Let's review: He promises us persecution at the hands of our family and friends. He promises trial and imprisonment by governors and princes. He promises ridicule, opposition, and outright violence for his name's sake. He tells us that his Way is straight but exceedingly narrow, difficult to navigate at times but clearly plotted and mapped out. Along the Way, he promises us battle after battle in a war he has already won. We have before us a long, hard struggle against an Enemy who cheats, steals, lies and has no moral qualms about using whatever he needs to ensnare us. Finally, he tells us that to follow him with our whole hearts and minds and bodies, we must follow him all the way to the Cross and the Tomb. That's a promise too. Given all these promises, we would have to be out of our minds to even think of crowding around this guy and begging him for his help. And yet, here we are, celebrating his death and resurrection, participating in his divine life.

Why do we follow around a man whose own family thought he was out of his mind? All those promises of pain, loss, tribulation were not made to warn us off, to keep us away. They aren't predictions or punishments. Jesus' promises to us are the consequences of living in the world while not being of the world. IF you follow me, THEN you will be persecuted. It must happen b/c the world cannot abide its own imperfection and those seeking perfection in Christ are irritating reminders that there are more and better ways of being human, more and better means of being perfect. The world accuses: how dare you point out my diseases and disabilities by seeking a way to have yours healed? There's nothing wrong with me, do not tempt me to believe otherwise by pointing out your own faults and how you've come to have them mended! For all the suffering we are promised as a consequence of following Christ, there is one promise that balances the scales: we will be made perfect in the Father's love. In fact, even as we seek that perfection now, we abide in His love. We may be out of our minds for following a crazy man, but we follow him into an audience with the Father to see him face-to-face. Where the Head goes, the Body follows. And b/c we believe, we speak. Or better: we preach! We reveal, we disclose what he has done and is doing for us. That makes us preachers.

Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->

It all belongs to God

9^th Week OT (T)

Fr. Philip Neri Powell OP

St. Albert the Great, Irving

“Why are you testing me?” Great question. And we know the answer. They aren't so much testing Jesus as they are trying to trap him. Watch five minutes of a Congressional cmte hearing with hostile witnesses and you'll see the trap. Ask what appears to be a genuine question. But the question is loaded with assumptions, false dilemmas, and ill-defined terms. Any direct answer to the question-asked implicates the witness and the answer ends up on the evening news as as out-of-context, deceptively edited clip. Jesus is no dummy. He knows the trick. And he's a master at answering the question that wasn't asked. He tells the Herodians and Pharisees to give to Caesar what's Caesar's and to God what's God's. An inoffensive response that leaves his prosecutors in amazed silence. Maybe they hear the underlying assumption of Jesus' response. Maybe they don't. What belongs to Caesar? What belongs to God? Well, everything belongs to God, including Caesar! Caesar may not acknowledge God's ownership, but that failure doesn't change the fact that God the Father is the Creator of the Universe, the first cause of all that is and will be. Caesar lives and moves and has his being in God, so there is nothing Caesar has that doesn't first belong to God. Jesus' response to the trick question essentially says, “Give it all to God.” Sure, we have to pay taxes. But we're doing it with God's coin. We are paying God's taxes with God's coins. And Caesar gets to play the middle man while he lives. Think about all this is terms of grace: God created us to be perfect as He is perfect. We do this by choosing to participate in His divine life. But the ability to choose to participate is itself a gift from God. When we fail to participate fully, He gives us the gifts we need to get back on track. Even the ability to receive and use these gifts is a gift. It all belongs to God. Opting out of this economy of divine love is a possibility. Love after all entails freedom. But there are consequences to opting out like there are consequences to not paying taxes. Namely, we free ourselves from the every source of our creation and our re-creation in Christ. We set ourselves outside the divine economy, refusing to reap its benefits – now and forever. But even then, it all belongs to God. All we've done is fail to love God. He still loves us. And he will honor our choice not to love Him. We belong to Him. He doesn't belong to us.

Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->

Blessed are those who reveal the Word

St. Charles Lwanga

Fr. Philip Neri Powell OP

St. Albert the Great, Irving

Celebrating a martyr's death challenges us to put Christ first. By “first” I mean over all, under all, around all, and through all. The martyrs held on to Christ in the face of persecution and death not b/c they hoped to be rewarded in heaven, but b/c they themselves were Christ to the limits of their capacity to be Christ. They could no more deny Christ than they could deny themselves. To do so would've been a lie. When Jesus preaches his Sermon on the Mount, he is laying out for us what being Christ in the world looks like. Seen up close, it looks like poverty, suffering, loss, and immeasurable joy. Seen from a distance, it looks like detachment from passing things and attachment to all that endures. Detaching from the temporary and attaching to the permanent inevitably brings the kind of loss and suffering that only wayfarers encounter. We are on our way along the Way and leaving behind anything and anyone who will not follow causes us grief. That grief is cured in knowing that we are walking toward Christ and that those we've left behind are as free as we are to follow along. If we've done our job faithfully, they will see what we see and hear what we hear and know that nothing in this world can bring them enduring happiness. Blessed are those who bear witness to the mercy of God and blessed are those who reveal the Word of God to those who think themselves unworthy of His love.   

Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->

How do we know it's true?

7^th Week of Easter (S)

Fr. Philip Neri Powell OP

St. Albert the Great, Irving

We know that John's testimony is true. That's what John says about himself in his gospel. How do we know that his testimony is true? Well, it depends on what we mean by “know” and “true.” If we think that “knowing the truth” is about having overwhelming scientific evidence that a statement is true or false, then it would be difficult to say whether or not John's testimony is true. His gospel purportedly records real historical events taking place in real physical places. We know from other historical sources that these events took place and that these places are real. But is the gospel just about events and places? That is, is what's fundamental to the Good News verifiable through history and geography? As an incarnational faith, Christianity is certainly revealed and practiced in space and time. So, yes, history and geography are vital. But the gospels do more than give us verifiable facts like the time and location of the crucifixion, etc. The gospels record how sinners – like you and me – encountered Christ and came to follow him into a new life. That sort of witness can be true w/o being factual. How do you “fact-check” an encounter with the Living God? You can't. So, how do we know that John's testimony is true? In one sense, we don't. In another, more important sense, we do. Our own experiences of being forgiven and re-created in Christ matches what John – and Mark and Matthew and Luke – says about his own love of Jesus and how that love transformed him. We recognize – re-think or think-again – how we were brought into relationship with Christ. We see how others are brought into the Body and flourish as new creatures. We see people who have hit rock bottom, fall on through into surrender, and receive God's abundant mercy. We see ourselves fall and fail and get back up with the grace of God and march on with the work we've been given to complete. We've seen the ones we love – maybe even ourselves – fall out of the faith altogether and return when the darkness get too thick to breathe. We've grieved and loved and forgiven and lost, and we did it all with Christ by our side. That kind of truth isn't testable in a lab or checked in an archive. It's lived. And we have the gospels to give us the divine pattern of living in the world w/o being of it. We have the gospels to show us the possibilities of being Christ for others as he was and is for us. We know John's testimony is true b/c it's our testimony. . .in a different age with different characters and better technology. . .but the testimony – at its root – never changes. John's testimony? Christ died so that we don't have to. Repent. Believe. And follow Christ.

Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->