NB. I was asked to celebrate and preach the 7.30am Mass for the nuns.
5th Sunday of Lent
Fr. Philip Neri Powell, OP
Monastery of OLR, Summit, NJ
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->
5th Sunday of Lent
Fr. Philip Neri Powell, OP
Monastery of OLR, Summit, NJ
Standing before him in the temple area is a woman accused of adultery.
Standing behind her are her accusers, the scribes and Pharisees who hope
to trip him up with a tricky legal question: should this woman be
stoned to death according to the Law of Moses? The woman's accusers
present their bear-trap case to him and then wait for his reply. What
does he do? He bends down and writes in the dirt with his finger.
Befuddled by this strange behavior, the woman's accusers continue to
press their questions and demand answers. Finally, he straightens up and
says to them, “Let the one among you who is without sin be the first to
throw a stone at her.” Then, he bends down to write again in the dirt
with his finger. The woman's accusers drift away, leaving Jesus and the
woman alone. This is what happens when the demands of justice collide
with the need for mercy; or rather, what happens when our need for
justice collides with God's demand that we freely grant mercy.
Justice—to be truly just—must flow from righteousness, a righteousness
that no man or woman possesses. The best we can do is imitate Christ and
grant mercy.
Jesus and the adulterous woman are left alone in the temple area. Her
accusers have fled b/c they know the Law as well as Jesus does. They
know that their accusations against her—though true—are also incomplete.
According to her accusers, the woman was “caught in the very act of
committing adultery.” Where is her accomplice? The Law requires that a
man caught in adultery be stoned as well. Since the woman was “caught in
the act,” why is she not being accused by those who caught her? The Law
requires that the witness to a capital crime throw the first stone.
When Jesus challenges the accusers to carry out the death sentence, “in
response, they went away one by one, beginning with the elders.” Pouring
salt in their wounded pride, Jesus publicly accuses the accusers of
being sinners themselves and forces them to acknowledge their
sinfulness. He knows the Law as well as they do, so he publicly
humiliates them all by exposing their hypocrisy under the Law. How can
they accuse this woman of violating the Law when they themselves violate
the Law by accusing her as they have? Justice—to be truly just—must
flow from righteousness, a righteousness that no man or woman
possesses.
Jesus shows the accusers that they are unjust by challenging them to
follow the Law. They can't. Doing so would condemn them under the Law.
To underscore his own accusation, Jesus writes in the dirt, following
the Sabbath Law that forbids the work of writing on paper on a holy day
but allows writing in the dirt. Though John doesn't tell us what Jesus
is writing in the dirt, tradition tells us that he is alluding to the
prophet, Jeremiah. Jeremiah cries out, “O Lord, all who forsake You will
be put to shame. Those who turn away on earth will be written down,
because they have forsaken the fountain of living water. . .” Another
translation reads, “The rebels shall be enrolled in the netherworld.” To
have your name written in the dust is to be enrolled in the netherworld
as a shameful rebel against God. The woman's accusers watch Jesus
writing in the dirt; remember Jeremiah's righteousness cry to God; and
then ask themselves: are we prepared to be consigned to the netherworld
as rebels against God? “In response, they went away one by one,
beginning with the elders.” Confronted—even subtly—by their own failures
in holiness, the scribes and Pharisees simply fade away to plot another
trap for the Lord.
The story of the adulterous woman and Jesus' merciful response to her
sin can be a trap for us. Has been a trap for us. When finally left
alone with the woman, Jesus asks her, “Woman, where are they? Has no one
condemned you?” She answers, “No one, sir.” Jesus is the only one left
to pass judgment, the only one truly qualified to condemn her for her
sin. He says, instead, “Neither do I condemn you. Go, and from now on do
not sin any more.” The trap for us here is to read Jesus' challenge to
the accusers and this final act of mercy as a judgment against calling
out sin. In other words, b/c Jesus shows the accusers to be sinful
themselves and b/c he does not condemn the woman, we're to believe that
no one should ever call a sin Sin. When the Pope or our bishops
challenge abortion or same-sex marriage, how often do we hear the
culture respond, “They shouldn't throw stones given their track record
on sexual abuse”? Somehow Jesus' challenge to the righteousness of the
woman's accusers has been perverted into a blanket denial that sin can
be named Sin. What's missing here is Jesus final word to the woman, “Go
and sin no more.” He grants mercy to the person while naming sin Sin.
And that's the difference btw man's justice and God's mercy. Man's
justice condemns both the crime and the criminal. God's mercy passes
sentence on the sin and forgives the sinner. By forgiving the sinner,
God does what God Is: Love. Forgiveness of sin, showing mercy to the
sinner is in no way an admission that sin isn't sin. The righteous do
not need mercy, therefore, only the unrighteous may receive it; that is,
only those found guilty of sin require mercy in the first place. It's
vital to our growth in holiness that we understand how God's mercy
relieves us of the burden of sin. The weight of disobedience is
crushing. Under the heavy load of sin, we cannot follow after Christ; we
cannot complete our mission “to go and do likewise” if we are suffering
in slavery to our disobedience. This is why the Father sent to Son to
lift this burden off our backs. Christ has removed the yoke of sin and
we are now free to follow him. When Jesus refuses to condemn the
adulterous woman all he is doing is freeing her so that she might choose
to take up his yoke and do the joyous work of witnessing to God's
mercy. Adultery is still adultery. But no sin—not even adultery—can
forever chain a soul in servitude when the Father's forgiveness is
freely offered and freely received.
Lent is our time to stare intently at the dirt to see if our names are
written there.
But the time for watching the dirt is almost over. We are rapidly
approaching the empty tomb on Easter morning. Ahead of us, drawing us
in, is the emptied cave where Jesus went to rest. But for our sakes, he
didn't rest. Instead, he rose; he rose to the Father and sent his Holy
Spirit to dwell among us, strengthening us along his Way, encouraging us
in our temptation to despair for a lack of holiness. Lent is a time set
aside for us to search the dirt for our names. It's that time in our
lives when we set ourselves against ourselves to fast, pray, give alms;
to acknowledge our total dependency on God; to give Him thanks and
praise for His blessings; and to generously share those blessings. If it
seems that we pay too much attention to sin during Lent, remember:
God's mercy frees us; His forgiveness unburdens us. But without the
confession of our sins, without acknowledging our sins, we cannot
receive His mercy. No man or woman possesses the righteousness required
to free themselves from sin, or to dispense others from the rot of their
sins. Christ alone is able to say, “I do not condemn you. Go, and sin
no more.”
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->