The Solemnity of the
Mary, Mother of God, celebrates the decision taken at the Council
of Ephesus (431) against the teaching of the Patriarch,
Nestorius, who held that a human person could not be said to have
given birth to God. The Patriarch of Alexander, Cyril, argued that
Mary, as the chosen instrument of the Incarnation, conceived and gave
birth to the Word, Jesus, fully human and fully divine, one person
with two natures. Mary, then, is properly understood to be
“Theotokos,” God-bearer.
Cyril wrote (in part) to Nestorius:
Cyril wrote (in part) to Nestorius:
"And
since the holy Virgin brought forth corporally God made one with
flesh according to nature, for this reason we also call her Mother of
God, not as if the nature of the Word had the beginning of its
existence from the flesh.
For
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was God, and the Word was
with God, and he is the Maker of the ages, coeternal with the Father,
and Creator of all; but, as we have already said, since he united to
himself hypostatically human nature from her womb, also he subjected
himself to birth as man, not as needing necessarily in his own nature
birth in time and in these last times of the world, but in order that
he might bless the beginning of our existence, and that that which
sent the earthly bodies of our whole race to death, might lose its
power for the future by his being born of a woman in the flesh. And
this: In sorrow you shall bring forth children, being removed through
him, he showed the truth of that spoken by the prophet, Strong death
swallowed them up, and again God has wiped away every tear from off
all faces. For this cause also we say that he attended, having been
called, and also blessed, the marriage in Cana of Galilee, with his
holy Apostles in accordance with the economy. We have been taught to
hold these things by the holy Apostles and Evangelists, and all the
God-inspired Scriptures, and in the true confessions of the blessed
Fathers."
Cryril published twelve
anathemas against Nestorius. Cyril's letters and his anathemas
became the primary texts from which the council fathers drew up their
canons for the council.
The first anathema reads:
“If anyone will not confess that the Emmanuel
is very God, and that therefore the Holy Virgin is the Mother of God
(Θεοτόκος), inasmuch as in the flesh she bore the Word of
God made flesh [as it is written, The Word was made flesh] let him be
anathema.”
The fifth anathema reads:
“If anyone shall dare to say that the Christ
is a Theophorus [that is, God-bearing] man and not rather that he is
very God, as an only Son through nature, because the Word was made
flesh, and has a share in flesh and blood as we do: let him be
anathema.”
As is the case with all
Marian dogma and doctrine, we are immediately directed back to Christ
as our Lord and Savior. No Marian dogma or doctrine is declared or
defined in isolation from Christ. She is always understood to be an
exemplar of the Church and a sign through which we come to a more
perfect union with Christ. Though our Blessed Mother is rightly
revered and venerated, she is never
worshiped as if she were divine. She is rightly understood
as the Mediatrix of All Graces in so far as she mediated,
through her own body, the conception and birth of Christ, who is
Grace Himself. In no sense are we to understand our Blessed Mother as
the source of grace. Rather, she was and is a conduit through which
we benefit from the only mediation between God and man, Christ. In
her immaculate conception and assumption into heaven, our Blessed
Mother is herself a beneficiary of Christ's grace. As such, she
cannot be the source of our blessedness, our giftedness in Christ.
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->