St. Thomas the Apostle
Fr. Philip Neri Powell, OP
St. Dominic, NOLA
Dominicans
love to preach these readings for St. Thomas the Apostle's feast day
b/c it gives us a chance to preach on one of the Church's
philosophical foundation stones: there
is no inherent contradiction btw faith and reason.
There is no inherent contradiction btw faith and science. BishopRobert Barron recently noted that many young people who leave the
faith often do so b/c they've been convinced that faith and science
are opposed to one another. They choose to give their allegiance to
science and abandon their faith. Of course, what they are really
doing is simply switching their allegiance to another religion, one
called “scientism,” the religious belief that naturalistic
science is the only source of human knowledge. How is this a
religious belief? Well, the founding principle of scientism is:
“naturalistic science is the only source of human knowledge.”
That is not scientifically provable theory. It is a metaphysical
assertion, and believing it to be true w/o scientific evidence is
religious. In the face of Thomas' demand for scientific evidence of
his identity, Jesus says, “Blessed are those who have not seen and
have believed.”
It's
vitally important to note here that Thomas did not doubt the witness
of his fellow apostles. He denied it. He doesn't say, “Well, maybe
Jesus showed up. I don't know.” He says, “Unless I see the mark
of the nails in his hands, etc. . .I
will not believe.”
I WILL not to believe. He's Denying Thomas, not Doubting Thomas. And
his demand for empirical evidence must sound perfectly reasonable to
us. Alien abductions. The rougarou
– that's Bigfoot's Cajun cousin. “Climate change.” The Loch
Ness monster. Honest politicians. We want to believe, but we need
actual evidence. Actual unmanipulated, empirical evidence. What we
usually get is “recovered memories,” scratchy audio recordings,
blurry photos, altered historical data, and campaign spin. So, when
Denying Thomas lays out his conditions for believing – “I want to
touch the nailmarks in his hands and the gash in his side” – we
can almost hear ourselves saying, “Darn right! Prove it!” But
Jesus says to Thomas, “Have you come to believe because you have
seen me?
Blessed are those who have not seen and have believed.” That's a whole other kind of standard for belief.
Blessed are those who have not seen and have believed.” That's a whole other kind of standard for belief.
Notice
the progression of Thomas' encounter with the Risen Lord: He sees. He
believes. And then he is blessed. Jesus gives him and us a different
progression: We believe. We are blessed. And then we see. In other
words, belief is not a matter of assenting to the weigh of empirical
evidence. I don't believe that objects fall to the ground when
dropped. I know they do. To believe is to give assent to a truth that
I do not yet fully understand, that I cannot yet fully articulate. By
assenting to this truth – by believing – I receive the graces,
the blessings necessary to see the truth more and more clearly as I
grow in holiness. First, believe; then, see. Faith and science cannot
oppose one another b/c both reveal divine truths. Faith cannot tell
us how to measure the speed of light. Science cannot tell us why
there is something rather than nothing. But both can reveal what is
true. Denying Thomas' error is believing
that empirical evidence is a necessary condition for religious
belief. IOW, he starts with a false religious belief in search of a
true religious belief. That will get you nowhere. Fast. Jesus says,
“Blessed are those who have not seen and have believed.” Put on
the mind of Christ. Believe. Be blessed. Then see.
Follow HancAquam or Subscribe ----->