tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18842286.post3369999010562533802..comments2024-02-26T09:30:54.111-06:00Comments on Domine, da mihi hanc aquam!: Questions the media wouldn't askFr. Philip Powell, OPhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14970857401221305221noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18842286.post-51944959312954053752010-04-11T23:10:20.289-05:002010-04-11T23:10:20.289-05:00And actually I highly recommend taking a look at t...And actually I highly recommend taking a look at the Maciel case. There, the facts were presented and defenders of Maciel went vague mode and talked about anything other than the facts. Here it is the opposite. MSM publishes its usual hack jobs, and instead of getting vague, people like Phil do the work and demonstrate that they are just dead wrong on the facts. <br /><br />So, there are seven questions here with answers. If someone thinks any of them are incorrect, I'm all ears. If all you have is just more overheated pitchfork-and-torches rhetoric, kindly put a sock in it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18842286.post-56404173894077198502010-04-11T22:33:51.068-05:002010-04-11T22:33:51.068-05:00I'm sorry that your world-view is being destro...<i>I'm sorry that your world-view is being destroyed</i><br /><br />Even if I thought that was true, why don't I believe he is sorry?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18842286.post-77520960275322171432010-04-10T23:33:17.224-05:002010-04-10T23:33:17.224-05:00Ludi, what's truly pathetic here is that you a...Ludi, what's truly pathetic here is that you are using Andrew Sullivan as your source. <br /><br />Now. . .enough has been said.Fr. Philip Powell, OPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14970857401221305221noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18842286.post-57690583868375182812010-04-10T22:33:30.376-05:002010-04-10T22:33:30.376-05:00Game over.
Stop embarrassing yourself. At some p...Game over.<br /><br />Stop embarrassing yourself. At some point you have to face facts. Do you really want to be on the side of the child-rapist protectors? It's getting pretty pathetic by this point. I'm sorry that your world-view is being destroyed - it must be very disconcerting.<br /><br />The Maciel case alone is dispositive. And that's just one case of many...and many more to follow.<br /><br />Do you think there won't be more? The signature will be his legacy. Sad but true.<br /><br />http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/04/the-third-strike.htmlLudiDomesticinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18842286.post-72295712690637565732010-04-10T14:25:16.090-05:002010-04-10T14:25:16.090-05:00Question for you Father, and all readers - do you ...Question for you Father, and all readers - do you think this search for ANYTHING linking the Pope to a pedophile case is going to continue long term? It really seems to have hit a fevered pitch in the last few weeks. I feel like I need to "gird my loins and arm for battle". It is too easy to be complacent and hope "someone else" (whoever that may be) will defend the Pope and the Church to the average man on the street. I feel like I must constantly explain the truth of these (as I find answers) to my friends and acquaintances. <br /><br />Just wondering what you all think. I know the battle against evil must be continuous. This one seems more personal.<br />Thanks!templariidvmnoreply@blogger.com