tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18842286.post1810224194489827909..comments2024-02-26T09:30:54.111-06:00Comments on Domine, da mihi hanc aquam!: $328,825 for a photoFr. Philip Powell, OPhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14970857401221305221noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18842286.post-69702277970215412832009-05-09T23:47:00.000-05:002009-05-09T23:47:00.000-05:00hmmm.. And Obama's predecessor, Clinton, wouldn't...hmmm.. And Obama's predecessor, Clinton, wouldn't fly over Rwanda and block their hate-speech on radio leading up to their genocide because...<br />it cost over 8,000 a fly-over.<br /><br />nice.kcnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18842286.post-60237466815192450862009-04-29T23:56:00.000-05:002009-04-29T23:56:00.000-05:00are you surprised??!!are you surprised??!!MightyMomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02563721884001643857noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18842286.post-69236004975871001762009-04-29T11:39:00.000-05:002009-04-29T11:39:00.000-05:00Okay, you can color me stupid but with all the adv...Okay, you can color me stupid but with all the advances in technology and the way we've seen it used/abused with fauxtography, why didn't they just do some Photoshopping? <br /><br />No scaring the batsnot out of Big Apple residents, no harm to the enviornment from jet engines gulping gallons of fuel by the minute, no extra maintenance costs from the flight of the planes, etc. Am I missing something?<br /><br />Seriously, it's the 21st Century, let's use the technology of it fer crying out loud.Subvethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13523683273450353313noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18842286.post-22853381313984205002009-04-29T11:16:00.000-05:002009-04-29T11:16:00.000-05:00Wow, just wow.Wow, just wow.Baron Korfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07215856728880521796noreply@blogger.com