tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18842286.post7987456203008028921..comments2024-02-26T09:30:54.111-06:00Comments on Domine, da mihi hanc aquam!: Delete the emails! More from the climate-hacksFr. Philip Powell, OPhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14970857401221305221noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18842286.post-43521368985922432422009-11-21T08:59:54.096-06:002009-11-21T08:59:54.096-06:00On a different topic, did you see this: www.manhat...On a different topic, did you see this: <a href="http://www.manhattandeclaration.org/" rel="nofollow">www.manhattandeclaration.org</a><br /><br />"We will fully and ungrudgingly render to Caesar what is Caesar’s. But under no circumstances will we render to Caesar what is God’s."<br /><br />Signed by people as various as Archbishop Dolan of New York, Joni Eareckson Tada, Chuck Colson, Archbishop Chaput of Denver, and Peter KreeftElizabeth Rhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03247588949025978208noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18842286.post-63966788427954302632009-11-21T08:28:30.734-06:002009-11-21T08:28:30.734-06:00Reminds me of stories regarding the Piltdown Man. ...Reminds me of stories regarding the Piltdown Man. Good example of people seeing what they want when presented with lies, falsehoods and half truths.<br /><br />"...it's looking more and more like the whole thing really is nothing more than a giant hoax."<br /><br />Gee, who'd a thunk it?Subvethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13523683273450353313noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18842286.post-18506858419053293592009-11-21T08:13:54.400-06:002009-11-21T08:13:54.400-06:00Alan, in order for results to be peer-reviewed the...Alan, in order for results to be peer-reviewed the data used has to be public. They were not only hiding exculpatory data but altering it as well.<br /><br />Also, the emails indicate that they were picking and choosing who their "peers" would be...IOW, they were intentionally trying to dodge sceptics. That's not what scientists with integrity do.Fr. Philip Powell, OPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14970857401221305221noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18842286.post-15494884220378088642009-11-21T07:48:21.131-06:002009-11-21T07:48:21.131-06:00Not that I am an avid follower of the climate chan...Not that I am an avid follower of the climate change craze, but a couple of questions still linger.<br /><br />The emails seem to indicate that the authors truly believe global warming to be real, though they appear to be fudging the numbers to bolster it. In other words, they do not believe the concept is fake and therefore attempt to justify what they are doing.<br /><br />Second, regarding the numbers, especially when things go through the IPCC, these things are peer reviewed like crazy. How do fudged numbers stand up to that scrutiny, unless hundreds are in on the conspiracy? I know that many scientists are willing to push the agenda, but I'm not sure I'm convinced that all of them are willing to fudge numbers or accept fudged numbers to do it.<br /><br />Just my two cents as I try to make sense out of this thing...Alan Phippshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12007722006477331382noreply@blogger.com